[NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor Poll

Woodward, Jim (US SSA) jim.woodward at baesystems.com
Mon Jan 26 04:15:58 AKST 2009


It costs $2100/month to print and mail out the K-Factor the way we do it
now?   What is the primary cost driver, format or postage?

 

Thanks,

Jim

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dennis
Bodary
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 9:41 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor Poll

 

The poll did not include a 50/50 mix. I would'nt mind a bimonthly
K-Factor and could live with an electronic version every other month.

 

Makes me wonder how much advertising might be lost on a all electronic
version. 

--- On Sat, 1/24/09, Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com> wrote:

	From: Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
	Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor
Poll
	To: "'General pattern discussion'"
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
	Date: Saturday, January 24, 2009, 12:19 PM

	It's a lot easier to allow for a "pull" of the K-Factor versus a
	"push" of
	it... Pushing it means that we'd clock up the internet traffic
lanes.  You
	will receive a reminder email that it is available. 
	 
	-----Original Message-----
	From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
	[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
Jeff Hatton
	Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 9:01 AM
	To: General pattern discussion
	Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor
Poll
	 
	The electronic copy to download is good, but I would prefer at
least a
	reminder Email when a new one becomes available,  and the option
to have it
	attached to the email would be even better.
	 
	 
	Jay Marshall wrote:
	> You might want to upgrade your printer Ron. I have a 8 year
old HP 970 
	> that prints both sides automatically. The real issue might be
cost. 
	> What would it cost in ink to print a complete K-Factor in
color on my 
	> printer vs the cost to have NSRCA print it? I can't carry my
desktop
	to
	the throne room.
	> 
	> Jay Marshall
	> 
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
	> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
Ron Van 
	> Putte
	> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 11:42 AM
	> To: General pattern discussion
	> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper
K-Factor Poll
	> 
	> I like a paper copy, so I'd print it out to take it out to my
hobby 
	> shop or the "throne room".  It is against my Scottish
background
	to 
	> just print out a file one side only.  I'd like to print both
sides of 
	> the paper.  If we decide to go with an electronic K-Factor
only, it 
	> would be nice to have the PDF files arranged so, if we had a
6-page K- 
	> Factor, we could print out pages 1, 3, and 5, remove the
sheets from 
	> the printer, flip over the sheets, reinsert the pages in the
printer
	> and print out pages 2, 4 and 6 on the back of the respective
pages.   
	> I know I could do it one page at a time with what we have now,
but, 
	> with a 32-page K-Factor, that's a lot of shuffling around.
	> 
	> Ron Van Putte
	> 
	> On Jan 24, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
	> 
	>   
	>> Optional when one renews - if we can work out the pricing
details on 
	>> the paper only version.
	>> 
	>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-

	>> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Joe
Lachowski
	>> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 8:11 AM
	>> To: NSRCA Discussion List
	>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper
K-Factor Poll
	>> 
	>> I guess having the option to choose which way you want it
when you 
	>> renew is out?
	>> 
	>> I read it as an all or nothing kind of thing.
	>> 
	>> 
	>> 
	>> From: derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
	>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:41:30 -0800
	>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor
Poll
	>> 
	>> 
	>> On the NSRCA website - http://www.nsrca.us - there is a poll
that 
	>> we'd like everyone to participate in.
	>> There are two options on the poll:
	>> 1.  NSRCA Membership with electronic K-Factor only 2.  NSRCA 
	>> Membership with paper K-Factor The board would like to find
out the 
	>> level of interest of everyone (NSRCA members and others) as
to 
	>> whether they would prefer to receive their K-Factor
electronically or 
	>> whether they'd like to receive it as a paper copy (as it is
done 
	>> currently).  Pricing on each type of membership is unknown at
this 
	>> time, however, we believe that the electronic only membership
would 
	>> probably result in dues that are less than the paper K-Factor

	>> membership.
	>> Please pass this email on to others that may not be connected
to this 
	>> list - you do not have to be an NSRCA member to participate
in this 
	>> poll.
	>> 
	>> HotmailR goes where you go. On a PC, on the Web, on your
phone. See 
	>> how.
	>> _______________________________________________
	>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
	>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
	>>     
	> 
	> _______________________________________________
	> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
	> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
	> 
	> _______________________________________________
	> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
	> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
	>   
	 
	_______________________________________________
	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
	 
	_______________________________________________
	NSRCA-discussion mailing list
	NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
	http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090126/0f93ecf5/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list