[NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor Poll

Derek Koopowitz derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
Sat Jan 24 09:38:29 AKST 2009


Please remember that this is a pulse survey (poll) - just to see what the
interest level is in receiving an e-KF option.  Nothing truly scientific in
this poll... :-)

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Black
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 10:15 AM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor Poll



I don't believe this poll will be valid because the only people that will
vote are those that already use electronic means to monitor Pattern
activities.

 

Keith Black

 

 

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Derek
Koopowitz
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:42 PM
To: 'General pattern discussion'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Electronic versus Paper K-Factor Poll

 

On the NSRCA website -  <http://www.nsrca.us> http://www.nsrca.us - there is
a poll that we'd like everyone to participate in. 

There are two options on the poll: 

1.  NSRCA Membership with electronic K-Factor only 
2.  NSRCA Membership with paper K-Factor 

The board would like to find out the level of interest of everyone (NSRCA
members and others) as to whether they would prefer to receive their
K-Factor electronically or whether they'd like to receive it as a paper copy
(as it is done currently).  Pricing on each type of membership is unknown at
this time, however, we believe that the electronic only membership would
probably result in dues that are less than the paper K-Factor membership.

Please pass this email on to others that may not be connected to this list -
you do not have to be an NSRCA member to participate in this poll.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090124/08a6399b/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list