[NSRCA-discussion] Happy New Year
billglaze
billglaze at bellsouth.net
Wed Jan 7 14:59:02 AKST 2009
And when we did those 3 "maneuvers" in the 50's, they were followed by a
figure 8, the crossover point of which was directly over the heads of the
pilot and judges.(!) That completed the "compulsory" portion of the
pattern. Other than, of course, the taxi out, (scored) and takeoff
(scored.)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Burton" <burtona at atmc.net>
To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Happy New Year
> SFO, Procedure turn, SFB were never one maneuver as I remember back in the
> early 70's when I was flying them. They were always 3 maneuvers judged and
> scored separately.
> BTW, I hope they never put those 3 in the FAI schedules. They are by far
> the
> most difficult sequence to do correctly of any I've ever flown. It's been
> a
> long time, if ever, since I've given a 10 on a procedure turn. It's still
> in
> the SPA schedule and it's still rare to see a good one.
> Dave Burton
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Doug
> Cronkhite
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:26 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Happy New Year
>
> Great.. so the judging guide conflicts with itself even.
>
> Maneuver 3 states that since the stall turn (a turnaround maneuver) is
> between straight flight out and straight flight back, it's entry and
> exit altitude should be the same.
>
> Then in maneuver 5, there is a specific note that since the 1/2 reverse
> cuban 8 is a turnaround maneuver, its entry and exit altitude may differ.
>
> IF the straight flight out, turnaround, and straight flight back were 1
> maneuver as they used to be (SFO, procedure turn, SFB) the the relative
> altitude would be a judging criteria. However, since these are 3
> separate maneuvers, the performance of one maneuver MAY NOT be used as a
> judging criteria for another. To quote another part of the judging
> handbook:
>
> "*Be independent*. Ignore the scores of other judges. Do not converse
> about scores. Score each maneuver on its individual value. Dismiss
> consideration of each maneuver as soon as you record its score."
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> J N Hiller wrote:
>>
>> I said I was finished once but you guys are having way too much
>> trouble with this turnaround altitude issue.
>>
>> Here is the link to the NSRCA Judging Section. Just click on Sportsman.
>>
>> http://nsrca.us/judginghome.html
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list