[NSRCA-discussion] Mandatory Advancement

[Ken Thompson]

Jim,

Thanks for posting this.  I HOPE to get a chance to fly more this year and I could really use this exercise to get back in the groove.  I've been away from competitive flying for far too long, 2 Pattern contests since '06 and a few IMAC contests in '07 and '08...way too long.

Ken
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: J N Hiller 
  To: jimgrunt at sbcglobal.net ; General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mandatory Advancement


  Jim,

  Sounds like my wife and I back in the 80's. We enjoyed many weekends out of town with friends, especially Saturday night dinners.

   

  The jump to intermediate is probably the most demanding of them all due to the need to master the airspace. The 07+ schedule may be excessively difficult increasing the K-factor from sportsman 26 to intermediate 41 is significant, picking up 6 K-3 maneuvers and flown entirely in the box. Modern pattern (turnaround style) is as much about fixing the flight as flying the maneuvers and the experience needed to stay in the box when recovering from blown maneuvers is an accomplishment in itself.

     

  A few days ago I posted (S&L Flight (Flying The Box)) as a reminder to occasionally return to the basics when we get sloppy. I am attaching a document I put in a local IMAC newsletter back in 1996 to help beginning turnaround competitors. Ignore references to rules which are outdated but the flying exercise is well worth a few passes. It also helps to fly individual maneuvers alone until they can be flown without much thought. The processor under our hat can become overloaded quite rapidly and being able to stay reasonably close to the 'on-line' between maneuvers is key.  

   

  Mastering the challenge in itself can be rewarding. 

  Jim Hiller

    

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Jim Gruntkowski
  Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:20 PM
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Mandatory Advancement

   

        Hello everyone. My name is Jim Gruntkowski and I'm relatively new to pattern. I flew my first contest in May of 2007 in sportsman and met a great bunch of people that gave me more help than I can actually take in at one time. I flew 4 contest that year and was told to move up to intermediate which was okay because there is more competition in intermediate. 2008 was a very busy year at work which didn't leave much time for practice but we went to contest anyhow so I can show my wife whata fool I can make out of myself. Mostly the reason we went to contest the 2008 was to get away for a long weekend and spend time with new friends. I can honestly say that I didn't enjoy myself as much as I should have due to the fact that I just wasn't ready to compete in intermediate. It was a little depressing before the last contest I told my wife maybe we should just skip the last contest because it wouldn't be worth the money for the travel and hotel and not be competitive. We did go and we had a great time. Did I mention my wife is my caller. But if someone told me I had to move up to advance this coming season I would probably take a year off. This is a hobby and I love it but I also want to be competitive. I have other hobbies that are competitive and have seen all types of sand baggers but that's just a part of life. I honestly believe that people know they're flying abilities and what class they should be flying in and if they stay in the class just because they know they can win contests then so be it. I will still go to contest and have fun. If someone told me I had to move to advanceIwould probably take a year off to practice but that wouldn't help attendance at local contest would it so it doesn't make sense to me why you would force someone to move up that doesn't have the ability to fly in the next class.
       

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090204/8d5b8429/attachment.html>