[NSRCA-discussion] Mandatory Advancment
Tom Simes
simestd at netexpress.com
Mon Feb 2 11:43:39 AKST 2009
Mark Atwood wrote:
> I¹m coming in very late to this discussion, but regardless of the system, I
> really think the primary change needs to be that instead of ANY mandatory
> system, we change the key word to be ³Guideline²...meaning it¹s a guideline
> for when to move, but not a fast rule. This is pattern...a hobby. Yes, a
> competitive one, but there¹s no huge money riding on it (certainly not at
> the levels that are subjected to this) and there will always be valid
> exceptions that no system can take into account. So while we can and should
> work on improving the advancement system to be as accurate as possible, I
> will likely submit a proposal that simply changes the existing system to be
> a guideline, rather than mandatory.
>
> I personally think that fixes almost everything. (well...with regard to
> pattern advancement). :)
>
> -Mark
In PACSS, Gene already has the underpinnings built and working for
national results reporting. I'm not advocating one way or another,
just throwing out a data point that one of the hardest parts to
coordinate is already in place.
With regard to mandatory advancement, one aspect that I think deserves
careful attention is how to handle people getting back into pattern
after an absence or people who have reached a point in their lives
where their skills are in decline for one reason or another.
It's sad to see a competitor who progressed into the higher ranks
years ago and feels obligated to stay there but whose skills are
obviously not adequate for the class anymore. If mandatory
advancement is being considered, there should also be a mechanism to
move downward as well - instead of just leaving the hobby.
--
Tom
======================================================================
"Z-80 system stack overflow. Shut 'er down Scotty, the system's
sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
Tom Simes simestd at netexpress.com
======================================================================
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list