[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba vs. JR

Doug Cronkhite seefo at san.rr.com
Mon Feb 2 11:36:49 AKST 2009


Gimme info on the new 10ch!

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Mark Atwood <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>  
wrote:

> Gotta go Airtronics!  Especially now that I’ve seen the new 10channe 
> l 2.4 (small plug!)
>
> Futaba supported the TOC??  Didn’t Bill Bennett, aka owner of Circus 
>  Circus Hobbies (and the hotel/casino)  and primary importer of JR c 
> reate/sponsor the TOC?  Just making sure my history is correct...
>
> -M
>
>
> On 2/2/09 1:12 PM, "Richard Strickland" <pamrich47 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am on my forth, 4th generation Futaba--just got an MZ (was going  
> to do it a couple years sooner--but I didn't know how my back  
> problems were going to work out) and the more I mess with it, the  
> more I think I'm going to like it--a little intimidating at  
> first....not so bad once you get in to it..
> I probably became a fan as Futaba supported the TOC and pattern  
> fairly well early on--JR seemed to be almost an 'also ran' at the  
> time.  Obviously they make excellent radios now and are well thought  
> of in the KC area.  Now I think of it as a Ford/GM sort of  
> comparison--er, Honda/Toyota...
>
> FWIW,
>
> Richard
>
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:26:25 -0800
> From: getterflash at yahoo.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba vs. JR
>
> Airtronics
>
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com
>
>
> From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2009 6:54:34 PM
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba vs. JR
>
> What are your thoughts? . . .
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090202/4fa7a85f/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list