[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba vs. JR
Doug Cronkhite
seefo at san.rr.com
Mon Feb 2 11:36:49 AKST 2009
Gimme info on the new 10ch!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Mark Atwood <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
wrote:
> Gotta go Airtronics! Especially now that I’ve seen the new 10channe
> l 2.4 (small plug!)
>
> Futaba supported the TOC?? Didn’t Bill Bennett, aka owner of Circus
> Circus Hobbies (and the hotel/casino) and primary importer of JR c
> reate/sponsor the TOC? Just making sure my history is correct...
>
> -M
>
>
> On 2/2/09 1:12 PM, "Richard Strickland" <pamrich47 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am on my forth, 4th generation Futaba--just got an MZ (was going
> to do it a couple years sooner--but I didn't know how my back
> problems were going to work out) and the more I mess with it, the
> more I think I'm going to like it--a little intimidating at
> first....not so bad once you get in to it..
> I probably became a fan as Futaba supported the TOC and pattern
> fairly well early on--JR seemed to be almost an 'also ran' at the
> time. Obviously they make excellent radios now and are well thought
> of in the KC area. Now I think of it as a Ford/GM sort of
> comparison--er, Honda/Toyota...
>
> FWIW,
>
> Richard
>
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:26:25 -0800
> From: getterflash at yahoo.com
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba vs. JR
>
> Airtronics
>
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com
>
>
> From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2009 6:54:34 PM
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba vs. JR
>
> What are your thoughts? . . .
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090202/4fa7a85f/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list