[NSRCA-discussion] Weight limit in AMA classes

[Bob Wilson]

Dave,
Drop me a note offline (wilsorc at gmail.com) so we can discuss this.  I'm
submitting an article to the K-Factor on this subject.

Thanks,
Bob Wilson

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dave Burton <burtona at atmc.net> wrote:

> I have submitted a rules proposal to completely eliminate the 11 lb. Weight
> limit in AMA pattern classes. (proposal 11-11).
> I'd like to see some discussion on the pros and cons of this proposal on
> the
> NSRCA e-mail list and the Pattern forum.
>
> My reasons for submitting the proposal include the following points:
>
> 1. There is no competitive advantage to a heavier plane with the 2 meter
> size constraint (in fact I'd argue a heavier plane is usually at a
> disadvantage and perhaps a minimum weight makes more sense than a maximum)
> 2. The 2 meter size constraint is sufficient keep the weight of pattern
> planes to reasonable limits.
> 3. The fact that AMA class planes are weighed only at the US Nationals
> gives
> proof that the rule is not now enforced and not needed.
> 4. The 11 lb. Weight limit drives up the cost of pattern planes through the
> necessary use of more expensive high tech materials. (If you don't believe
> "light weight" cost a lot of money ask the people who race sail boats)
> 5. Removing the weight limit will reduce the manpower and cost associated
> with running the Nationals And also perhaps increase participation.
>
> OK, guys, what do you think?
> What other "pro" and "con" points?
> Dave Burton
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091211/1525f145/attachment.html>