[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba Servos

J Shu jshulman at cfl.rr.com
Thu Dec 10 13:53:44 AKST 2009


I've flown the same design plane, one with 9650's and the other with 9151's, and there was a difference. The one with the 51's was a 
much better (predictable) snapping plane. The 50's were speed sensitive (downlines were never the same).

Andrew is right about the low profile Futaba's. I was running the BL-551, 1.6oz, 
(http://www.futaba-rc.com/servos/brushlessservos.html) in my Integrals and now in my Valiant. The 9551, 1.6oz, 
(http://www.futaba-rc.com/servos/digitalservos.html) is the non-brushless version (that Andrew was running in his Integrals). The JR 
9411 will also work fine, I just don't have experience with them.

Regards,
Jason
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave" <DaveL322 at comcast.net>
To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba Servos


> Dave,
>
> Quite a few guys are running the JR 9411 on ailerons on 2M stuff.  You'll
> save about 1.5 oz for the pair.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave Lockhart, Team JR
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dave Burton
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 5:07 PM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba Servos
>
> I have a question about Futaba servos (I'm a JR user) from some Futaba
> flyers.
> Are the Futaba 9650 digital servos suitable for ailerons on an electric 2
> meter plane (Intrgral)? I'm looking to save a couple ounces over the full
> size JR 8411SA I'm using now.
> Thanks,
> Dave Burton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list