[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba R6106 HF/HFC Comments?
Joe Lachowski
jlachow at hotmail.com
Wed Dec 2 05:16:17 AKST 2009
Crawl back in your hole and finish those airplanes junior<g>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:50:11 -0800
From: jpavlick at idseng.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba R6106 HF/HFC Comments?
No falls no balls. I'll try it if someone sends me a receiver... LOL
John Pavlick
--- On Wed, 12/2/09, Jeff Hatton <jeff at priusonline.com> wrote:
From: Jeff Hatton <jeff at priusonline.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba R6106 HF/HFC Comments?
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 8:04 AM
I have tried both in park fliers, I flew them both out as far as I
could see them without any issues... Still wouldn't want to be the first
one to try it in a pattern ship.
Bill's Email wrote:
> The actual weight specs are:
>
> 6106HFC = 0.25 oz (7.1 g)
> 617FS = 0.34 oz (9.8 g) (0.25 oz w/o case)
>
> So the difference is 0.09 ounces.
>
> To me that is insignificant and certainly not worth worrying about
> range for.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_________________________________________________________________
Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/videos-tours.aspx?h=7sec&slideid=1&media=aero-shake-7second&listid=1&stop=1&ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_7secdemo:122009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20091202/11183e03/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list