[NSRCA-discussion] WC's

[Atwood, Mark]

After today they will all have had equal exposure, so they will normalize everyone together for each round, and then take the best 3 of the 4.



From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bill's Email
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:16 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] WC's

I should note that I may not have calculated correctly. I normalized the total of the 3 best scores per pilot within their flight group. I am not sure if that is how they will do it. They may normalize each panel, then take the three best for each pilot from that. I'm not clear on which way they are doing it.


Bill's Email wrote:
Atwood, Mark wrote:
Looks like QQ put up a burner today (505) and Andrew flew another solid flight (468) beating Akiba today.    Waiting on scores for Brett and Jason who both fly in the afternoon there.



I took the scores and normalized them. Here are the top ten from the 2 groups that are done flying:

SOMENZINI     USA          1484.4    1000.00
AKIBA     JPN                    1448.6    1000.00
JESKY     USA                   1424.2      983.16
MAYR     AUT                     1448.8      976.02
ZEINER     AUT                    1394      962.31
KAISER     LIE                    1404.4      946.11
NORTHEAST CAN             1394.4    939.37
DANKSAGMULLER   AUT 1393.4    938.70
ROMBAUT     ESP             1347.2    930.00
BUTUZOV     RUS              1342       926.41







________________________________






_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.60/2311 - Release Date: 08/25/09 06:08:00
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090826/ad64fc14/attachment.html>