[NSRCA-discussion] Bob's Highly Unofficial Worlds Scores

[Derek Koopowitz]

Not the case at all - the interpreter gave him the wrong information that
was written on the score sheet.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com> wrote:

>  What!? Judges that don’t know the rules???
>
>
>
> *Jay Marshall*
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Derek Koopowitz
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:12 AM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Bob's Highly Unofficial Worlds Scores
>
>
>
> Steve,
>
> One judge was marking a noise penalty due to a misinterpretation in
> language.  He thought he was marking that the plane was quiet - it has been
> corrected.  The way the noise penalty is done is that a majority of judges
> need to mark the noise box and then a penalty of 10 points is applied per
> judge.  So on a 5 judge panel, 3 out of 5 need to mark the noise box.
>
> -Derek
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:38 PM, <Snaproll4 at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
>
>
>    I noticed on some of the score sheets that a judge would mark a "10" on
> the noise line.  Is this a penalty and how is it applied?
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> In a message dated 8/24/2009 8:34:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> getterflash at yahoo.com writes:
>
>  I believe he is 14th or 15th.  These rankings will change somewhat as the
> next two days unfold.  For those who are interested, the normalized scores
> are based on the highest score in a given panel so far. Since half the
> scores in each panel are still unflown, it is possible for the perfect
> scores to get knocked down. The spreadsheet I built will self correct as I
> enter the full panel scores.  But I just checked, the scores are no longer
> posted, so maybe we won't see any more until Wednesday night.
>
>
>
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Ryan Smith <smaragdz at bellsouth.net>
> *To:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 4:10:40 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Bob's Highly Unofficial Worlds Scores
>
> Yes he did!
>
> -------------- Original message from Mark Hunt <flyintexan at att.net>:
> --------------
>
> From the looks of things Brett flew well today too...Go Team!
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com>
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 2:42:15 PM
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Bob's Highly Unofficial Worlds Scores
>
> Here are the top 10 after today.  Keep in mind none of this counts for
> beans until all pilots have flown in front of all judging panels, which
> should happen by this time on Wednesday. For example, Andrew and Christophe
> have yet to fly in front of the same panel. But is still fun.
>
>
> Dorsal Last Name First Name Country Equalized Total
> 72 PAYSANT - LE ROUX CHRISTOPHE FRA 2000.0000
> 14 SOMENZINI Quique USA 1961.5232
> 90 AKIBA YOICHIRO JPN 1953.8462
> 29 BERND BESCHORNER GER 1938.6991
> 87 JESKY ANDREW USA 1929.6564
> 70 SILVESTRI SEBASTIANO ITA 1920.7747
> 69 ONDA TETSUO JPN 1916.8531
> 34 SUZUKI KOJI JPN 1904.8799
> 81 ZEINER MARKUS AUT 1891.7513
> 68 SHULMAN JASON USA 1871.5430
>
>
> GO Team  ! ! ! ! !
>
>
> Bob Kane
> getterflash at yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090825/d3020fb1/attachment.html>