[NSRCA-discussion] SD-10

[Ronald Van Putte]

Geez!  I was happy with 512.

Ron VP

On Aug 24, 2009, at 3:13 PM, mike mueller wrote:

>  So a 2048 is smoother than a 1024 by double. I wonder at what  
> point you no longet "feel the difference".?
>  For me it could be as soon as tomorrow. M2
>
> --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Jay Marshall <lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SD-10
>> To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 3:05 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Frank, you
>> are getting your terms mixed
>> up. The 1024 & 2048 refer to the number of
>> “steps” from one end
>> of the stick movement to the other. The speed, known as
>> latency, is the time it
>> takes from the instant you change the stick to the time the
>> servo moves. Actually,
>> it is the time until the servo receives the command to
>> move. The two functions
>> are not dependant upon each other.
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as
>> keeping up, that depends on
>> servo speed. It is possible to have a switch change which
>> instantly commands a
>> function from low to high, for example. The time to get
>> there, however, will
>> depend on how fast the servo can move.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jay Marshall
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original
>> Message-----
>>
>> From:
>> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
>> On Behalf Of
>> frank
>>
>> Sent: Monday,
>> August 24,
>> 2009
>> 3:30
>> PM
>>
>> To:
>> 'General pattern
>>  discussion'
>>
>> Subject:
>> [NSRCA-discussion] SD-10
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Anthony,
>> Jim, Mark , and Others
>> who Responded,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for
>> your valuable input.
>> I’ve read that this radio’s resolution is or is
>> among the very
>>  fastest; so much so that even digital servos
>> can’t keep up with it.
>> I understand  that the system is 1024 , but
>> can’t help but
>>  wonder why it isn’t 2048. I’m sure
>> I’ll get past my
>>  hangup, but would appreciate everyone’s
>> insight’s on that
>> one.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Frank
>> Imbriaco
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion