[NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

Sat Aug 1 07:13:08 AKDT 2009

Tony can put your Kraft on SS so I bet he can put your Knight Kit on SS as well!
His column appers in RCReport online magazine at http://rcreport.net/

John Ferrell  W8CCW

"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue."
-Barry Goldwater
"You don't get harmony when everybody sings the same note."
-Doug Floyd

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Kane 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:36 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

  Does SS mean Solid State?  I just put new tubes in my Knight Kit transmitter !!!!

  Bob Kane
  getterflash at yahoo.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>
  To: NSRCA Discussion List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:36:13 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

  It really isn't just about cutting costs either. It is also about other AMA membership complaining about the site not being available for their use. You would not believe the number of complaints AMA has had about the AMA site being tied up. That is why the overall Nats at the site has been shortened in length. 

  If you are on 72, better plan on moving over to SS in the future. I've heard rumours that the AMA has been considering making the AMA site SS only in the future.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:57:16 -0700
  From: homeremodeling2003 at yahoo.com
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

        This is really funny. They want to bring the nats to 2 weeks to cut costs. I am sure they make money the way it is. Take this for what it is, heresay, but  I heard that the members of the club were complaining that the nats takes too much of their time away from their field for them to fly. Wasn't the field built for a localized nats site? And I'm pretty sure we all paid for it. The ama will lose out if they go to a 2 weeks nats IMO. Wait till they see entry's decline. 

        Chris 

        --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:

          From: Tony <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
          To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
          Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 12:55 PM

          That is a possibility also.  AMA is thinking about returning the NATS to a 2 week all-events NATS like used to be done.  If all events are together, HQ can put all costs into one effort.  If they are all split up, Each group would have more costs to deal with due to the fact that HQ can’t send a group of people to every site.

          Tony Stillman, President

          Radio South, Inc.

          139 Altama Connector, Box 322

          Brunswick, GA   31525

          1-800-962-7802

          www.radiosouthrc.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Tim Taylor
          Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:39 PM
          To: General pattern discussion
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?

                It was done, It was called NPAC

                Tim

                --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net> wrote:

                  From: Bill's Email <wemodels at cox.net>
                  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Flash Poll - Relocate the Nats in 2010?
                  To: " General pattern discussion " <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
                  Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 2:06 PM

                  Why not allow the SIGS to do their own thing? IMAC and NSRCA do not need to share a site. The LSF can find a site for the soaring NATS. Pylon knows what venues work for them and so on. FF can do their own thing as well. Why tie soaring and FF together and so on??

                  Tony wrote: 

                  Matt:
                  Yes, it is just difficult to tell if it is actually feasible…  The problem is that it requires a large site for Pattern/Pylon/IMAC and will require another large site for Soaring/Outdoor FF.  It may be very difficult to actually find places that can handle this group.

                  Tony Stillman, President

                  Radio South, Inc.

                139 Altama Connector, Box 322

                Brunswick, GA   31525

                 1-800-962-7802 

                www.radiosouthrc.com

----------------------------------------------------------------

                -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

                _______________________________________________
                NSRCA-discussion mailing list
                NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
                http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

          -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Celebrate the moment with your favorite sports pics. Check it out.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20090801/62201ccf/attachment.html>