[NSRCA-discussion] CF gear needs and something to talk about
Wayne Galligan
wgalligan at att.net
Fri Oct 24 17:55:11 AKDT 2008
EeeeYahh.... I have had two serious mishaps (read crashes) and was able to
repair both sets. Amazing what a little thin c/a and some more carbon fiber
will do. I luv the stuff. I use the light carbon weave to re-enforce
cowling and wheel pants and just about anything else you can think of. Gray
has introduced me to making a great carbon foot print in the hobby.
Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CF gear needs and something to talk about
> Hmmmmm. "durable and repairable" Sounds like a man with experience.
>
> Ron VP
>
> On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Wayne Galligan wrote:
>
>> I have found the Bolly gear to be very durable and repairable. I think
>> the swept back design lends to the right kind of flexing to absorb shock
>> and stress and it rooks marverous.
>>
>> Wayne
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Dennis Bodary
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:29 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CF gear needs and something to talk
>> about
>>
>> As far as designing a new gear. I would be extremely happy with a ES
>> gear or the exact copy. For my needs they were PERFECT. Anything else
>> would be a compromise. Maybe to make it worth the time and effort. They
>> could take pre orders. prepaid.
>>
>> That way instead of having to produce x amount and hoping they would
>> sell. this way the x amount would already be sold.
>>
>> As far as a hundered dollars goes. I've paid 70 dollars each for the
>> last two sets. A hundred dollars would really hurt me. But then again
>> when i first started flying RC i couldn't figure out why anyone would
>> pay more than five dollars for landing gear. Now i spend more than five
>> dollars for a gloplug.
>>
>> Dennis
>>
>> --- On Fri, 10/24/08, Gray E Fowler <gfowler at raytheon.com> wrote:
>> From: Gray E Fowler <gfowler at raytheon.com>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] CF gear needs and something to talk
>> about
>> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 9:37 AM
>>
>>
>> I am combining all the responses about CF landing gear. Getting into
>> designing and fabricating something as simple as landing gear will
>> require several thousand dollars, and a lot of time to refine the
>> design. Several people mentioned a gera of lighter weight. The weight of
>> the ES gear is just about the lower limit if not the limit. I have not
>> examined some of the other gear that are reported to be 4 oz heavier, so
>> I do not know why they are heavier. Some of the real light weight gear I
>> saw (very good weight) were always broken ...people asked me to help
>> repair.
>>
>> It appears a $100 gear would be a hit with the pattern crowd. As Earl
>> stated there already is a $150 gear so that bounds the cost. I will
>> investigate to see if this is possible and worth the time, money.
>>
>> Thanks for the input.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Gray Fowler
>> Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
>> Radomes and Specialty Apertures
>> Technical Staff Composites Engineering
>> Raytheon
>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
>> list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://
>> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list