[NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final Update...I hope...

Jay Marshall lightfoot at sc.rr.com
Fri May 30 08:21:13 AKDT 2008


Just like some YS have problems?

 

Jay Marshall 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of JShulman
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:11 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final Update...I hope...

 

Common Chad... just say it. You get what you pay for...lol

 

Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Chad Northeast
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 12:00 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final Update...I hope...

Some outrunners have problems :-)

Lets not group them all into one category ;-)

IMO it's a lot more effort in design for the OEM to get an outrunner to
compete with an inrunner in the larger sizes, but if they do it the result
is a much more reliable setup.  

Chad

----- Original Message -----
From: J N Hiller <jnhiller at earthlink.net>
Date: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:42 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final Update...I hope...
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

> You guys are starting to get my attention. Outrunners have 
> problems? Please
> tell me more. Keck I still run a muffler equipped two stroke but 
> I am
> interested in learning more about electric. Is the problem 
> associated with
> larger sizes only? I thought the simplicity of not running a 
> gearbox would
> be a positive thing even though electric motors appear to be 
> happier if they
> can turn more RPM's. It would appear that if the outrunners were 
> larger in
> diameter they would be better torque producers. Please post more 
> details.Jim Hiller
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Budd
> Engineering
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:36 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Desperate-Final Update...I hope...
> 
> Hey Jas,
> 
> Smoke is for amateurs.  I had one with flames!
> 
> : )
> 
> Jerry
> 
> 
> 
> Budd Engineering
> jerry at buddengineering.com <mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com>
> http://www.buddengineering.com
> 
> On May 29, 2008, at 7:01 PM, JShulman wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Chris, I already sent out all the "stuff" guys wanted from my 
> bin... I don't
> remember a Hacker request.....lol. Probably cause they aren't for
> sale...lol.
> 
> I figured something was up with the 1 worder... and don't feel 
> bad, you're
> not the only one that's smoked and electric.
> 
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com <http://www.jasonshulman.com>
> www.shulmanaviation.com <http://www.shulmanaviation.com>
> www.composite-arf.com
> <http://www.composite-arf.com>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080530/a857a43a/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list