[NSRCA-discussion] 2,4 Module

[Del Rykert]

Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2,4 ModuleI thought that was kb2joi  clear  <tic> 
 
    Del
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jay Marshall 
  To: 'General pattern discussion' 
  Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:35 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2,4 Module


  Roger that! Over and out ...



  Jay Marshall 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Mark Atwood
  Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:31 AM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2,4 Module



  Yeah...but do we REALLY want to go there????  Lmao...  Then it will start to sound like the HAM forum...




  On 5/8/08 11:27 AM, "Jay Marshall" <lightfoot at sc.rr.com> wrote:

  In free space.  Wire and dielectric will alter this somewhat. <grin>
   

  Jay Marshall 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Mark Atwood
  Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:20 AM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2,4 Module

  The antenna's we used on the 72mhz band were 1/4 wave antenna's.  Approx 1 m.  The 72Mhz wavelength is 416cm for a full wave (varying some for which specific frequency you were on.

  The 2.4Ghz wavelength is only 12.4cm or about 4.8in.   So an equivalent quarter wave antenna will only be about 1.2in in length.

  -M

  PS for those that care, wavelength (in cm) = speed of light (in cm) / Frequency (in cycles per second)


  On 5/8/08 10:54 AM, "rcmaster199 at aol.com" <rcmaster199 at aol.com> wrote:
  ***When you realize all this from that measley little 4" antenna, it's almost jaw-dropping.  ***

   
  Basically, the length of the antenna is related to frequency of the transmission. 2.4 gig freq is made up of small wavelength. If you remember High School Physics, the relation between Freq and Wavelength... ie- it's an inverse relationship. As Freq goes up, WL becomes small. At 72 meg, WL is fairly long, hence the reason for the longer antenna; at 27 meg, wl is even longer. Those who used 27 meg equipment a bunch of moons ago, will remember that Tx and RX antennas were pretty long and only represented 1/2 the WL (I think it was 1/2)
   
  Dean Pappas, Ed Alt and Jim Oddino can explain further if needed
   
  BTW, tuning a pipe on a 2 stroke requires similar understanding between rpm (base frequency) and tuning length (wavelength of the exhaust pressure front and type of exhaust) to achieve the desired resonance....similar to electrical antennas. QED
   
  MattK
   
   


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
    It has removed 7280 spam emails to date.
    Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
    Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len>  for free now!

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

    _______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion   


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com <http://www.mapquest.com/?ncid=mpqmap00030000000004> : America's #1 Mapping Site. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080508/e53b0909/attachment.html