[NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Interesting Wind Farms

[Matthew Frederick]

I agree with that point about nuclear power... Just gotta come up with 
something better than burying the spent fuel rods... Shoot em at the sun for 
all I care...

Matt
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nat Penton" <natpenton at centurytel.net>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.f3a.us>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:11 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Fw: Interesting Wind Farms


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bethany Lyles" <quantumqueen at hotmail.com>
> To: "Nat Penton" <natpenton at centurytel.net>
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 3:33 PM
> Subject: RE: [NSRCA-discussion] Interesting Wind Farms
>
>
>>
>> Wind cannot possibly meet our energy demand.  It only accounts for 0.7% 
>> of
>> the U.S.'s electrical production and just based on efficiency and total
>> area required to put up windmills the expansion can't be too great. 
>> There
>> are also the conservationists worried about birds flying into the
>> windmills and dying, etc.  It may increase, but the potential is not as
>> great as nuclear.
>>
>> love ya!
>> ________________________________
>>> From: natpenton at centurytel.net
>>> To: quantumqueen at hotmail.com; bpenton at austin.rr.com
>>> Subject: Fw: [NSRCA-discussion] Interesting Wind Farms
>>> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:07:54 -0500
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Steven Maxwell
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> How well do you know your celebrity gossip?
>> http://originals.msn.com/thebigdebate?ocid=T002MSN03N0707A
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion