[NSRCA-discussion] TP1010C upgrade to 2.3A

[Rex]

Man, I must be way behind the times....  I'm still using 2.1, without any problems.
I guess I better look at the upgrades.  LOL
 
Rex


To: johnfuqua at embarqmail.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.orgDate: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 09:57:00 -0400From: atwooddon at aol.comSubject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] TP1010C upgrade to 2.3A
What kind of problem.  I am running 2.3a without problems charging 10s, 3s and 2s packs.
 
Don-----Original Message-----From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>Sent: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 6:37 amSubject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] TP1010C upgrade to 2.3A



Is anybody having problems with 2.3a or is just me.
 
John


From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed AltSent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 7:21 AMTo: NSRCA Mailing ListSubject: [NSRCA-discussion] TP1010C upgrade to 2.3A
I see that Thunder Power has this new procedure when upgrading firmware, where you must either place a 10 to 15 ohm 5W resistor in series with the + power lead, or use a 9V FC-1 battery, otherwise void the warranty.  It's not clear to me what is special about a FC-1 battery.  From outward appearances, it looks like any other 9V dry cell, but who knows?  It's apparent that they want to limit the current and voltage during programming by using one of these new methods. Anyone know what the deal is here? ThanksEd

Watch “Cause Effect,” a show about real people making a real difference. Learn more. 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080329/666bdf91/attachment.html