[NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHz
Del Rykert
drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Sun Mar 2 09:23:20 AKST 2008
Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHzI thought many wireless devices were using the 2.4 GHz in homes and computer stuff. ?
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Randall Bearden
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2008 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHz
On 3/1/08 1:49 AM, "John Pavlick" <jpavlick at idseng.com> wrote:
Yeah, how many people experienced the bug in the early Spektrum stuff? We didn't hear too much about that one. The best part is they addressed it and used their resources to solve the problem quickly. Futaba is going through their teething pains now. NOTHING is perfect. It is in your best interest to use ANY new technology with extra caution until it develops a proven track record. I would be a little "extra" apprehensive about the XPS stuff only because it's not backed by large company like Futaba, JR or Airtronics. Small companies tend to have a harder time solving problems similar to the ones that we've seen with the Spektrum and Futaba systems.
John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com
From: Ed Alt <mailto:ed_alt at hotmail.com>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHz
Spektrum is going to come out with Telemetry for airborne radios. They've had it for years in their ground radios, so they have a handle on it. I also like the fact that their lead engineer who started the entire Spektrum line with Horizon came from Cypress Semiconductor, the chip vendor for the Spektrum stuff. Futaba has a great base of experience with Spread Spectrum. Their teething pains seem to have more to do with re-packaging their existing technology in a scramble to play catch-up with Spektrum.
Every radio has problems here and there, as we've seen over the years with 72 mHz gear, so when I hear that something just totally died in a few isolated cases, it does not alarm me. However, "the big 3" have proven that they deliver good products overall and will address problems that do exist. XPS on the other hand has made some questionable claims and really has no solution to provide path diversity for the receiver. If you look at Futaba and also Airtronics full range SS receivers, they get path diversity from placing each antenna at the end of thin coax leads that allow them to each have a unique RF environment, much like Spektrum accomplishes with actual receivers at the end of data leads that feed a central unit.
If it was me trying to use XPS, I would spend a couple of years test flying it in stuff I could afford to lose, same as I did with Spektrum when it first came out. I wounded a foamy with a AR6100 receiver that had an early firmware bug, which Horizon acknowledged and fixed. It had nothing to do with radio reception; it was the one that would slap down elevator and stay there. Nice! Since then, all of my foamy kills have been directly traceable to my thumbs.
Ed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:17:06 -0800
From: edvwhite at sbcglobal.net
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHz
Ed,
I've been digging into (ie, poking around RCU) for XPS issues and as is usually the case find mostly secondhand and anecdotal problems along with a few really unhappy people. I also find a lot of happy XPS users. I am attracted to the XPS because it offers the future possibility of telemetry, something I would like to play with. Lastly on the Spektrum, I've seen only a handful of systems fly at our local field. I've also seen two crashes on two different Spektrum systems due to total loss of control, at close range. At least one of those verified good battery voltage under load after the crash (the other one didn't check).
I know there are a huge number of satisfied Spektrum users. I know of two locally who are not quite so satisfied. Neither ever did figure out the reason for the loss of control. And with Futaba's recent problem (which they have fixed), well I think we all have to realize there is no bulletproof system. Just looking to see if people have had problems with the XPS.
Ed
Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
With a proven solution from Spektrum / JR and with Futaba introducing what will undoubtedly be a solid solution, why play with XPS? I can't think of any advantage that it offers and it apparently has some issues to dig into and understand.
Ed
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:44:14 -0800
From: edvwhite at sbcglobal.net
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Speaking of 2.4GHz
Anybody have experience with the xtremelink systems?
http://www.xtremepowersystems.net/
Ed
Ken Thompson <kthompson at stx.rr.com> wrote:
That's pretty cool, thanks for bringing this to the list. I saw this in the Flying Giants first thing this morning.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Brice <mailto:kevinbrice at earthlink.net>
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:25 AM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] The Great 2.4GHz DSM Giveaway
For those on the 2.4 fence, this may encourage you to upgrade to DSM.
I am not sure if the html graphics will show so here is the link to Spektrum's Receiver Giveaway.
http://www.spektrumrc.com/giveaway/
Kevin Brice
kevinbrice at earthlink.net
----------------------------------------------------------------
From: Spektrum Signal [mailto:webmaster at spektrumrc.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:00 AM
To: kevin at wenzlerarchitects.com
Subject: The Great 2.4GHz DSM Giveaway
Having trouble viewing this email? Click here. <http://publications.horizonhobby.com/read/archive?id=1223&e=kevin@wenzlerarchitects.com&x=99e8f192>
February 28, 2008
PLEASE VISIT WWW.SPEKTRUMRC.COM/GIVEAWAY <http://publications.horizonhobby.com/t/322561/1056524/7046/0/> FOR MORE INFORMATION
Copyright © 2008 Horizon Hobby. All rights reserved.
If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, you may unsubscribe <mailto:leave-322561-1056524.eb728df499487cb49c599c8dbafb4236 at publications.horizonhobby.com>
Please send any questions, comments, or concerns to webmaster at spektrumrc.com <mailto:webmaster at horizonhobby.com>
Mailing Address: Horizon Hobby, Inc., 4105 Fieldstone Rd., Champaign, IL 61822
Spektrum is used with permission from Bachmann Industries, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star power. Play now! <http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan> _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am curious what "noise" from a house is detectable on a Spectrum Analyzer tuned to a center frequency of 2.4 GHz? Not even a 900 MHz wireless phone would even come close. Microwave? No wrong frequency, Wi Fi networks? No, wrong frequency. Granted if you tune the analyzer's center frequency well beyond 2.4 you might be able to see other signals or noise but the narrow bandwidth the 2.4 operates in and the clean signal/noise ratio doesn't lend itself to the idea of house noise causing interference. Also, unless you can narrow the display bandwidth way down then you won't see any frequency "hopping". The shift is very close to the carrier and unless you know what to look for then you can miss it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080302/bfae4296/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list