[NSRCA-discussion] Pocono

[Courtney, Gary Ray]

Amen!!! Calm air sucks!!!

gary 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:08 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Pocono

Interesting thing about calm air is that it happens very infrequently, 
so practice in calm air happens very infrequently. In general, we tend 
to fly rather poorly in it (too many overcorrections) as a result. The 
most frequent flaws I saw were flopped stalls, vertical lines leaning 
too much to correct an imagined head wind, radii very variable, flying 
way too far out and general lack of controlling distance out. From the 
judge's point of view, one could just sit there and count the 
flaws.....no wind to hide them behind (VBG)

I remember a contest in Georgia a few years ago where it was dead calm 
as in last weekend's Pocono contest. It took two rounds to recalibrate 
ourselves to flying dead air.

MattK

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Lawrence <ronnan57 at rochester.rr.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 9:24 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Pocono

Thanks to everyone that put on the Pocono
contest, It was a great contest. It was the calmest air I have ever
flown in.  Ron Lawrence

  ----- Original Message -----
  From:
  Joe
  Lachowski
  To: General pattern discussion

  Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
  Pocono

23 contestants. Yes, there were two lost to a midair.

 
And we had the best flying conditions you could ever ask
  for.







_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion