[NSRCA-discussion] Snap entry in FAI

JShulman jshulman at cfl.rr.com
Sun Jun 15 16:12:56 AKDT 2008


Bob, that's the easiest answer of all... automatic slider

Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bob Kane
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 8:09 PM
  To: General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap entry in FAI


  And then the biggest question of, should the field gate be opened inward
or outward.   I sure miss Indian City.


  Bob Kane
  getterflash at yahoo.com



  ----- Original Message ----
  From: JShulman <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
  To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:22:02 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap entry in FAI

  Must be even closer to the Nats... after this is Spins...lol.

  Are we talking shoulder rolling or straight rolling?

  Regards,
  Jason
  www.jasonshulman.com
  www.shulmanaviation.com
  www.composite-arf.com

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ken Thompson
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 7:24 PM
  To: johnfuqua at embarqmail.com; General pattern discussion
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap entry in FAI


  How can it be a snap if no pitch or break is shown?

  And yes...I know this comment is setting up a serious discussion :-)


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "John Fuqua" <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
  To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2008 6:18 PM
  Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Snap entry in FAI


  > For those FAI pilots at the Harvest contest this weekend who took the
  > position that the airplane need no longer show pitch or break to enter
the
  > snap I invite you to para 5B.7.5 of the FAI rule book.  Looks to me like
  > the
  > only change is that a zero is no longer appropriate but a mandatory
  > downgrade of more than 5 points is.
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG.
  Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1503 - Release Date: 6/14/2008
6:02 PM

  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG.
  Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1503 - Release Date: 6/14/2008
6:02 PM


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1503 - Release Date: 6/14/2008
6:02 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080616/eea73599/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list