[NSRCA-discussion] Correct Geometry on N
Chad Northeast
chadnortheast at shaw.ca
Tue Jul 8 09:11:03 AKDT 2008
I will be writing this on my call sheet, if Ken is on the panel...make hourglass square shape :-)
Really it works out in the wash, if the lines are 45's and the top and bottom heights are equal on both sides...the verticals should just fall into place as the correct length.
Chad
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Velez <kvelez at comcast.net>
Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 11:05 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Correct Geometry on N
To: atwoodm at paragon-inc.com, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Mark,
>
> I think this is consider a square althoug the cad program
> shows a smaller
> leg at the ends due to the rdii but the foot print is a square.
> I know you
> said the fundamental shape is a square I think calling it
> a rectangle will
> create confusion. As a Judge Iwill be looking for a Square shape>
>
> Ken
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
> To: <chad at f3acanada.org>; "General pattern discussion"
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Correct Geometry on N
>
>
> > Ouch! I stand corrected. The fundemental shape is square but
> the radii are
> > only tangent to the sides ... Not the top. Rectangle it is!!
> > Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chad Northeast <chadnortheast at shaw.ca>
> >
> > Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:11:41
> > To: <bob at toprudder.com>; General pattern
> > discussion<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Correct Geometry on N
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080708/e580516c/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list