[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba FAAST trouble
Jay Marshall
lightfoot at sc.rr.com
Fri Jan 11 03:29:23 AKST 2008
Just ONE suspicious and questionable incident. Doesn't worry me.
Jay Marshall
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Chale
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:22 PM
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba FAAST trouble
I guess I should have said radio not modules (thanks RVP. 6 ch and 7 ch.
Here is the RCU thread.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6857282/tm.htm
Stuart
_____
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Chale
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:37 PM
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba FAAST trouble
I am sure a bunch of you are watching the various threads on this, but if
not and you have one of the Futaba 2.4 systems, be careful. Apparently on a
couple of occasions one radio has shot down another. So far it has only
been reported a couple of times with the 6 and 7 channel modules only. The
word on the forums and I am not sure how accurate this is, is that some
transmitters have been shipped without programming a unique identifier into
them. They have the basic 0000. code. The receiver is bound to the
transmitter's supposedly unique code. So if two transmitters have not been
programmed with a unique ID then any receiver bound to one of them will
respond or be shot down by the other, because they essentially have the same
ID code. Again I am not sure that this is suspicion or fact but be careful
if you are flying one until more is known.
Stuart C.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080111/a571e696/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list