[NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??
Keith Hoard
khoard at gmail.com
Tue Feb 5 11:22:16 AKST 2008
Maybe you guys should take a cue from school sports and either 1) Not keep
score at all or 2) Give everyone a First Place ribbon for participating.
Either option would sure help out the judging dilemma!!
On Feb 5, 2008 2:12 PM, Nat Penton <natpenton at centurytel.net> wrote:
> AGREE, AGREE.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Dave Burton <burtona at atmc.net>
> *To:* 'NSRCA Mailing List' <nsrca-discussion at lists.f3a.us>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:10 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??
>
> No thanks from this old masters flyer!
>
> I don't want a trophy for finishing 5'th, nor do I want a trophy for
> being old!
>
>
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Glen Watson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:43 AM
> *To:* 'NSRCA Mailing List'
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??
>
>
>
> Quote:
>
> "Masters group- CDs should add an extra award.. Fourth and Fifth place.
> something to think about."
>
>
>
> A variation on this is to add additional awards by age category like at
> this year's NATS i.e. highest placing JR, SR, etc. by class at local
> meets.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Glen Watson
>
> http://glenwatson.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *
> MargueriteVG at aol.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:25 AM
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It would be best for the masters pilot who is at the bottom of the pack
> to STAY in Masters.. Moving back will not help that pilot advance.
>
>
>
> Moving back to a lower class
>
> .We have that situation covered for a pilot that has been out of
> flying and wants to get back into it but not for one who just wants to win
> in a lower class. Win but win with the BEST you can do..
>
> IF they flew and advanced they should continue on that path
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Masters group- CDs should add an extra award.. Fourth and
> Fifth place.
>
> something to think about.
>
> .
>
>
>
> Boredom in a lower class --------- we will lose that pilot
>
> Marguerite
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Its nice we have a problem with TO MANY pilots in Masters. A sign
> something is working here.
>
> Marguerite
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
> In a message dated 2/4/2008 11:45:16 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> mups1953 at yahoo.com writes:
>
> I would like to see the guys that are stuck at the bottom of their
> respective classes have an easier time going back a class. The main reason
> we have so many
>
>
>
> Masters flyers is we advanced guys thru the system before they were ready
> to compete due to a lack of competition. It's sad to see guys hit a brick
> wall and end up quiting the sport due to frustration.
>
> I like the idea that I can fly Fai or Masters based on my own volition.
> In the midwest we always have large fields in Masters and it's pretty hard
> to beat the field.
>
>
> Mike
>
> *"Woodward, Jim" <jim.woodward at baesystems.com>* wrote:
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.<http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
--
Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080205/173aaaf1/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list