[NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??

Mon Feb 4 06:41:42 AKST 2008

Hi Anthony,

Nice summary below.  Another way to tackle this is to have the top-2
Masters pilots for each district be required to move to FAI for the next
season.  This would open up the Masters class a bit and allow for some
reinvigoration into the class and allow some new blood to have a shot at
some wood.  While it may upset the two guys who would need to move for a
season, it would "invigorate" a whole bunch more to practice with some
enthusiasm.  After 1 season of FAI they could move back to Masters if
they want.  

Thanks,

Jim

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and proprietary information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

________________________________

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us] On Behalf Of Anthony
Romano
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:29 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Exper Class??

HMMM. Ponder this
Masters is the largest class at just about any contest in the country.
Masters presents a large judging load. 
Many want to leave Masters as it stands.
Many Masters pilots are frustrated by the extreme depth and
competitiveness of the Masters class.
A number of pilots want to fly FAI but are not ready for F sequences.
Many FAI pilots don't have the resources to prepare for 2 sequences.
Many of the top FAI pilots don't participate because we don't fly F
sequences.

Adding an expert class that flies the current P could help. Sequence
development and rules are already done. It would increases the judge and
competitor pool while improving the level of flying and judging. Really
no more work in scoring. So other than an extra set of awards, which
most would gladly waive, what harm would it cause?

If my club would let me CD a contest again I would try it. Once again I
agree with Jason. Should I be worried?

Anthony

________________________________

From: jshulman at cfl.rr.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:49:09 -0500
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed topic to killing Masters?

Sorry Doug, that makes too much sense and follows the basis of the way
pattern is supposed to be. That's unacceptable...lol.

8.2.5. There is no mandatory advancement into FAI from the Masters
class. Contestants may enter their current AMA class or the FAI class at
any contest but not both.

If a pilot does not like the way FAI is flown, he does not have to fly
it. An Expert class seems like a logical "solution" , but I believe it
has been shot down many times before. Wouldn't this be a great way to
get the one's who want more of a challenge than Masters, but don't want
to fly F, a class of their own? It could even be an "FAI type" of class
where Masters is still the highest class to advance into but pilots can
jump into and out of Expert at any time. Establish a rule, written or
not, that the pattern can not have any integrated rolling loops or
circles. This would allow the FAI pilots to continue to fly FAI, not
just half of it. Masters and Expert pilots could judge FAI, FAI and
Expert judge Masters, FAI and Masters judge Expert.

Sportsman- gets feet wet

Intermediate- likes wet feet

Advanced- ready to learn more

Masters- ready to fly more of what was learned

*Expert- the imaginary perfect in-between class 

FAI- wants to be challenged beyond what was learned

I really hope that here locally (D3) we don't do away with the F
sequence. But if that is what the majority decide is best for the class,
so be it. I know of 4 pilots that want to continue to fly F, and they
already compete in FAI.

Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Doug
Cronkhite
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:14 PM
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed topic to killing Masters?

Actually, I think the solution is to just decide once and for all that
Masters will not be the training ground for FAI and make the Masters
sequence the destination difficulty. I suspect that's actually been done
several times and people just keep trying to change it.

If people want to fly FAI, then they have to just deal with the problems
that go along with it. No more complaining that the jump from Masters to
FAI is too hard or they don't have the right airplane, because well..
too bad. 

Seems like this topic goes around the list AT LEAST once a year.

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
vicenterc at comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 12:43 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List; NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed topic to killing Masters?

Jason,

I agree.  Another solution is get the Master class the level that was
8-10 years ago.  It was between Advanced and FAI-F3A.  It was natural
for pilots wining Masters to move to FAI and not like we see now more
moving from F3A to Masters.  It is clear to me that the new Master
schedule is equal or harder than the new P schedule.  

--
Vicente "Vince" Bortone

	-------------- Original message -------------- 
	From: "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com> 

	So if FAI pilots, that are flying FAI now, want to fly FAI (P
and F), and Masters pilots, that are flying Masters now, want to fly
Masters, what are we really "discussing"? Are we looking for a middle
class to call Masters + for the guys that want to fly P and not F or
Masters? Sounds like the addition of an Expert class in AMA to give the
fliers in Masters, that want a P type of sequence, a place to go? 

	 Regards,
	Jason
	www.jasonshulman.com
	www.shulmanaviation.com
	www.composite-arf.com 

				-------------- Original message
-------------- 
				From: "John Fuqua"
<johnfuqua at embarqmail.com> 

				I have been following this discussion
with some relutance to jump in.  As a current Masters pilot and old time
F3A flyer I to once pushed to have the Master schedule be the P
schedule.  But you guys need to look at what FAI has done to the P
schedule.  Here is link to the F3A rules.
http://www.fai.org/aeromodelling/documents/sc4  

				FAI has reduced the total maneuvers to
19 including a non scored takeoff and landing.   AMA Master is 23
including a scored takeoff and landing.  

				Going to FAI would certainly speed
things up (which is what FAI intended for large contests like WC to
speed up the prelims and get to the real contest).

				Not sure this is what AMA/NSRCA
membership wants for a destination class.

				John

________________________________

				From:
nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del
Rykert
				Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 7:14 AM
				To: NSRCA Mailing List
				Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] changed
topic to killing Masters?

				Hi Dave..

				I never saw anyone suggesting to do away
with the Masters class.. I have thought of another restriction/factor.
Some of the FAI maneuvers require a specific designed plane to do them
well. If you don't have such an aircraft in your stable you can be
looking at a prohibitive change to switch to those type of planes or
live with the self imposed handicap. Granted, some of the best can make
a good showing in FAI type maneuvers but when needing the 1 point
advantage in a high K-Factor maneuver it does drive the contestants to
seek the best sled that works for them. 

				A good friend pointed out something I
had lost sight of once.  He acquired a newer designed airplane to his
stable that performed the maneuvers he was flying so much easier. The
design choice alone was raising his scores by almost 1 point per
maneuver. With only a little bit of practice with new plane. He never
appreciated the handicap he self imposed until having better equipment.
Heck.. I still have coreless servos and not a digital do I own..  How
far behind am I? LOL.  

				    Del 

				----- Original Message ----- 

				From: Dave Burton
<mailto:burtona at atmc.net>  

				To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.f3a.us>  

				Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 7:33
PM

				Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] F at
locals?

				Del, I've never advocated doing away
with the Master's class. I only suggested adopting the most current FAI
P maneuver schedule and fly Master's as a separate class as we do today.
Masters pilots would not be required to advance to the FAI class unless
they chose to do so. Seems to me like it solves several problems. It
allows a CD to have more flexibility in arranging flight lines, a larger
pool of knowledgeable judges, eliminates the need for NSRCA (or others)
to come up with a new schedule periodically for the Masters Class. I
don't think there is any difference in the difficulty level of the P
schedule and the Masters schedule today and would not require any
greater skill level than Masters does today IMO. 

				Dave Burton

________________________________

Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You IM, we
give. Learn more.
<http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080204/e6e52070/attachment-0001.html 