[NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral

[andrewjesky at charter.net]

Ed,

The Hacker A60-22s outrunner weighs in about 3 ounces heavier then the C-50 motor. So with the heavier motor and lighter packs I would assume that with the setup you mentioned you might be about the same weight as I'm at right now.

Andrew
---- Ed Miller <edbon85 at charter.net> wrote: 
> Thanks Andrew.  So with Pro Lite TP5300's, a speed controller sans heat 
> sinks and a Hacker outrunner it would be reasonable to expect an overall 
> weight 5 to 6 ounces lighter.
> Ed M.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "andrew" <andrewjesky at charter.net>
> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 11:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral
> 
> 
> > Just thought that I would jump in here really quickly about the plane. 
> > Even
> > though I haven't gotten to fly my Integral yet I must say that I have been
> > very happy with the overall construction of the model. It seems pretty 
> > well
> > built and the two that I have are super light. With a typical Hacker setup
> >
> > C-50 14XL Comp
> > Hacker 99spin controller
> > Thunder Power 10s1p 5000 mah
> > Thunder Power 2cell 730 mah receiver pack
> > Duralite regulator
> > 1-Futaba 9155 for the rudder
> > 2-Futaba 9550's for the ailerons
> > 2-Futaba 9650's for the elevator
> >
> > Mine have come in right at 10 pounds 10oz. I feel that this is good
> > considering the new TP packs are a little heavier then the old 5300's.
> >
> > Hope to have them flying shortly and will get back with the list and let
> > everyone know how they fly.
> >
> > Andrew Jesky
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John Pavlick" <jpavlick at idseng.com>
> > To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral
> >
> >
> >> Ed,
> >> Well either it's really GOOD and nobody wants to let you in on the secret
> >> or
> >> it's NOT so good and everyone is trying to be politically correct.<LOL>
> >> Why
> >> not just order a Black Magic? No secret there! You can probably have it
> >> built in time to fly this season. Never mind that composite stuff - get
> >> some
> >> wood!
> >>
> >> John Pavlick
> >> http://www.idseng.com
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: "Ed Miller" <edbon85 at charter.net>
> >> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> >> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:01 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral
> >>
> >>
> >>> Yes, I asked the question and haven't received any responses.  I thought
> >>> by
> >>> now there would be more than a few Integral's out there flying.
> >>> Ed M.
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >>> From: "colin chariandy" <cchariandy at yahoo.ca>
> >>> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> >>> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:21 PM
> >>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Comp ARF Integral
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I think someone on the list asked about the peformance of the Integral
> >>>>and
> >>>>there has been no responce.
> >>>>
> >>>>  So...anyone got one yet?
> >>>>
> >>>>  How is the build and how does it fly with glow power?
> >>>>
> >>>>  Colin.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------
> >>>> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email
> >>>> the
> >>>> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion