[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

[Matthew Frederick]

The point of the stamp was not for just those who want to go to the Nats, but if they wanted to compete in ANY(not just Pattern) AMA-sanctioned competitive event. That way the entire competition community helps pay for it, not just those who go to the Nats (otherwise you could just raise the cost of Nats entry). I was looking for a solution that did not cause an increase in the Nats entry fee yet still defrayed the costs of the Nats at a minimal cost to membership and zero cost to the "sport pilots" who don't want to keep paying for us to have our "little contests."

Matt
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com 
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 9:08 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1


  The stamp sounds like a good idea it could work.charge $20.00 for the competition stamp. 
  Let's see the Nat's is in the red $25,000.00 divide that by 6 weeks  = 42 days = $595.24 per day x 4 days = NSRCA  share = $2380.96 divide that by say 120 entrants = $19.84 each oops I forgot they raised the entry fee $10.00 this year, It could be that we only need to charge $10.00 for the stamp 
  I don't know what the total daily cost is but if we pay then other groups should also share the cost on an equal basis. 

  There is plenty open time at the Nat's site now to schedule other events most of those mentioned are never held during the Nat's because many of those flying in them are at the Nat's
  Buddy







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  See what's free at AOL.com. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070502/85eb6be4/attachment.html