[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

[BUDDYonRC at aol.com]

Kieth 
After reading some of the other replies to the stamp idea I am left with  
issues that may suggest that more information about the AMA income and budget is  
required to get to the actual cause of the red ink.
My idea was that only Nat's contestants would be required to pay for the  
stamp.
After some of the other input it seems that several SIG groups are  carrying 
the load for Nat's cost and that's OK with me as long as our individual  extra 
contributions are matched by other competitors and results in  preserving the 
existence of some of the old time original events which would  ultimately 
disappear without our help, but only if there was enough  interest and 
participation to warrant their inclusion as a Nat's event  by, as Tony stated requiring 
a minimum number of entries.
Like someone else said it would be interesting to know in detail where all  
the money comes from and where it goes, It's only right for that information to 
 be made available to any member who request's it.
If it is not available then we should be made aware of why  it isn't and 
based on that answer we may begin to question the  capability of the organization 
and their intent and or ability to  control the organization and preserve the 
intention for which it was founded  in the best interest. of the membership.
Buddy  



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070501/5e3c416f/attachment.html