[NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
Fred Huber
fhhuber at clearwire.net
Thu Mar 1 22:00:02 AKST 2007
Note that the 25 deg would be 1.5 points downgrade for other than FAI because its passed 22 deg of error (I'd downgrade it 2 points... its more than 1.5 * 15 deg error)
Now why should someone who hits 15 deg off on the point be doengraded less in FAI than the person who was 25 deg off?
Does this mean that if someone is 14 deg off that we can't downgrade because its "1 point per 15 deg"?
I say that if its 1 deg off (and you can see it) you've got a downgrade of 1/15 point. Start adding em up and ROUND DOWN to fit the 1.0 or 0.5 incriments. the 1 point per 15 degree is a guideline for how much to downgrade, not something that says if there's less than that much error there's no downgrade.
This is PRECISION aerobatics after all,.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Thompson
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
Larry,
Interesting points, the first roll is the only one to be downgraded, as I understand the rules. The 4 rotational points that are to be graded, point stoppage inclusive, are the 90, 180, 270 and the 360. The 90 has been over-rotated 25* in your scenario, downgradable to 1 point per 15*. You haven't reached the 2nd 15* so only one point can be deducted. Your second rotation stopped at the 180*, so no downgrade is applicable. It doesn't matter where the 2nd rotation starts, only where it finishes. This is the way I understand the rules, I'm sure if I'm wrong it won't be long before I find out.
The score for your scenario, no other downgrades applicable, would be a 9.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: Lisa & Larry
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
OK.Here is an interesting scenario.I'm learning and wish to judge fairly and accurately, not trying to start a debate.
4 point roll.1st quarter roll is 115 degrees (over rotated), second is 65 degrees (corrected wings level), 3rd and 4th are 90 degrees..No other visible downgrades
RCA-23 4-point downgrade 1 states, "One-Quarter rolls more or less than 90 degrees.
Based on how I read it, the maneuver is scored an 8 for two quarters not rolling 90 degrees even though the second quarter corrected to wings level.
The other interpretation would be the implication in item 1, is referencing 90 degrees to a vertical or horizontal plain, and not rotation, resulting in a score of 9.
I'll apologize now in advance for where this may go.
Larry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dave Lockhart
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:49 PM
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
The rules are -
- 1 point per 15 (FIFTEEN) degrees. Summing partial points is allowable (recommended).
- A "perfect maneuver" is not necessarily defect free - it is free of defects that would warrant downgrading to a 9 (in FAI) or a 9.5 (in AMA).
- when "on the fence", round up. Ie, a single 7.5 degree error in is a 0.5 point downgrade, - the score in FAI is 10, not 9.
Regards,
Dave Lockhart
DaveL322 at comcast.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del K. Rykert
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 6:30 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
I whole heartedly concur Fred. Thanks for your reply.
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Huber
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
There's half-points... and while at FAI the half point doesn't go on a score sheet... I still count them, and round down before putting the score on the sheet. 9.5 becomes 9 7.5 becomes 7. In your example.. he's going to have 3 or 4 half-points off for missing the points by appx 10 deg. That puts him to an 8. (with no other errors)
And again... the original said (paraphrased) "I can see a point, but can't see deviation from the 90 deg incrimental orientations" Thats NOT downgradable. If its off from the 90 enough to downgrade, you will see it. You're trying to compare apples and elephants. If you see the point happened and don't see the point being off orientation... you have given no reason for downgrade. Its a 10.
You can SEE the wings being more than 5 deg off level... If you can see it... its worth a half point downgrade at least. the knife is a little harder to see being off, especially when its centered.
If you are consistant... you can count tenths of a point errors if you want... then round according to your own method for a score that meets the whole point or half point incriments that get put on the sheet.
----- Original Message -----
From: Del K. Rykert
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
Hi Fred.
Do I assume 3 flyers you are judging doing point rolls, if all elements are done correctly, except for the points or a point, does pilot "A" who under rotates by 10º and pilot "B" who over rotates in a point by 10º and pilot "C" who nails the point @ 90º all get a 10 score? All other elements are done perfect. Not typical real world but have been their and had to score as I interpret the rules.
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Huber
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
The original description said the points were noted.
No downgrade for lack of points.
The original description just complained "I couldn't see if the point was ON the 90" Well that means it was less than 15 deg off because you WOULD see 15 deg off.
No downgrade.
No downgradable item was noted in the initial point roll description.
Its a 10
----- Original Message -----
From: Del K. Rykert
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
I sure concur Gene .
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Maurice
To: randy10926 at comtekmail.com ; 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
If the points are so fast as to make it indiscernible what angle they occurred at, then I would tend to doubt whether the point occurred at all. Score 0. It is the pilot's responsibility to present the maneuver in such a manner to demonstrate that the maneuver has in fact been done according to the rules. I sincerely doubt that a 4 point can be done in 1.25 seconds with defined stops in the roll every 90 degrees. But it remains that if, as a judge, you cannot clearly see the relevant elements of any maneuver being performed, then you should assume that IT HAS NOT been performed. The elements must be demonstrated not assumed.
Don Ramsey, can you clarify?
Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at sgmservice.com
Plano, TX
AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Hatfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:24 AM
To: nsrca-discuss list
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question
Ok time to get back to our favorite list questions.
This comes from a real life judging problem. The question is about the 4-point roll. This what I am seeing. A 4 point roll that takes less than 1.25 second to complete. You can see 4 very short pauses. The manever appears to be centered. I see no change in height or coming in or out. It appears to be between 150M and 175M. But the pauses are so short that I cannot really tell if the rolls between pauses are 90 degrees. So I cannot see what the 1 point per 15 degree down grade should be.
What would you do?
Randy
------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 2/27/2007 3:24 PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/707 - Release Date: 3/1/2007 2:43 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/707 - Release Date: 3/1/2007 2:43 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070302/9110a16f/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list