[NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

Thu Mar 1 19:40:46 AKST 2007

Ahhhh, It was too late to be asking this question
.

Correct the statement to be 1st quarter roll 105 degrees
OK 90 plus 15 is
105, correct
That’s what I was after
.

I corrected the e-mail attached to this one, too late for the other

Let’s try again
.

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
Frederick
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:29 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

As I see it, the scenario you stated scores an 8, but not for the reason you
gave. It scores an 8 because the initial over-rotation calls for a 2 point
deduction (actually a 1.67 point deduction) with no deduction on the second
point. As far as I understand corrections aren't downgraded, and you can't
actually expect someone who over-rotates on the first point of a 4-point to
rotate back to a 90 degree knife-edge before rolling inverted. I wouldn't be
surprised if I was mistaken on this, though.

Matt

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Lisa  <mailto:lld613 at psci.net> & Larry 

To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 10:09 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

OK
Here is an interesting scenario
I’m learning and wish to judge fairly and
accurately, not trying to start a debate

4 point roll
1st quarter roll is 105 degrees (over rotated), second is 65
degrees (corrected wings level), 3rd and 4th are 90 degrees
.No other
visible downgrades

RCA-23 4-point downgrade 1 states, “One-Quarter rolls more or less than 90
degrees.

Based on how I read it, the maneuver is scored an 8 for two quarters not
rolling 90 degrees even though the second quarter corrected to wings level.

The other interpretation would be the implication in item 1, is referencing
90 degrees to a vertical or horizontal plain, and not rotation, resulting in
a score of 9.

I’ll apologize now in advance for where this may go

Larry

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dave Lockhart
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:49 PM
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

The rules are –

- 1 point per 15 (FIFTEEN) degrees.  Summing partial points is allowable
(recommended).

- A “perfect maneuver” is not necessarily defect free – it is free of
defects that would warrant downgrading to a 9 (in FAI) or a 9.5 (in AMA).

- when “on the fence”, round up.  Ie, a single 7.5 degree error in is a 0.5
point downgrade, - the score in FAI is 10, not 9.

Regards,

Dave Lockhart

DaveL322 at comcast.net

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del K. Rykert
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 6:30 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

I  whole heartedly concur Fred.  Thanks for your reply. 

    Del

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Fred Huber <mailto:fhhuber at clearwire.net>  

To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:39 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

There's half-points... and while at FAI the half point doesn't go on a score
sheet... I still count them, and round down before putting the score on the
sheet.  9.5 becomes 9  7.5 becomes 7.  In your example.. he's going to have
3 or 4 half-points off for missing the points by appx 10 deg.  That puts him
to an 8. (with no other errors)

And again... the original said (paraphrased) "I can see a point, but can't
see deviation from the 90 deg incrimental orientations"  Thats NOT
downgradable.  If its off from the 90 enough to downgrade, you will see it.
You're trying to compare apples and elephants.  If you see the point
happened and don't see the point being off orientation... you have given no
reason for downgrade.  Its a 10.

You can SEE the wings being more than 5 deg off level...  If you can see
it... its worth a half point downgrade at least.  the knife is a little
harder to see being off, especially when its centered.

If you are consistant... you can count tenths of a point errors if you
want... then round according to your own method for a score that meets the
whole point or half point incriments that get put on the sheet.  

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Del <mailto:drykert2 at rochester.rr.com>  K. Rykert 

To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 1:51 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

Hi Fred. 

    Do I assume 3 flyers you are judging doing point rolls, if all elements
are done correctly, except for the points or a point, does pilot "A" who
under rotates by  10º and pilot "B" who over rotates in a point by 10º and
pilot "C" who nails the point @ 90º all get a 10 score?  All other elements
are done perfect. Not typical real world but have been their and had to
score as I interpret the rules. 

    Del

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Fred Huber <mailto:fhhuber at clearwire.net>  

To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:56 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

The original description said the points were noted.  

No downgrade for lack of points.

The original description just complained "I couldn't see if the point was ON
the 90"  Well that means it was less than 15 deg off because you WOULD see
15 deg off.  

No downgrade.

No downgradable item was noted in the initial point roll description.

Its a 10

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Del <mailto:drykert2 at rochester.rr.com>  K. Rykert 

To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:58 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

I sure concur Gene .

        Del

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Gene <mailto:gene.maurice at sgmservice.com>  Maurice 

To: randy10926 at comtekmail.com ; 'NSRCA Mailing List'
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:38 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

If the points are so fast as to make it indiscernible what angle they
occurred at, then I would tend to doubt whether the point occurred at all.
Score 0. It is the pilot’s responsibility to present the maneuver in such a
manner to demonstrate that the maneuver has in fact been done according to
the rules. I sincerely doubt that a 4 point can be done in 1.25 seconds with
defined stops in the roll every 90 degrees. But it remains that if, as a
judge, you cannot clearly see the relevant elements of any maneuver being
performed, then you should assume that IT HAS NOT been performed. The
elements must be demonstrated not assumed. 

Don Ramsey, can you clarify?

Gene Maurice
gene.maurice at sgmservice.com
Plano, TX
AMA 3408, NSRCA 877

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Glenn
Hatfield
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:24 AM
To: nsrca-discuss list 
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

Ok time to get back to our favorite list questions.

This comes from a real life judging problem.  The question is about the
4-point roll.  This what I am seeing.  A 4 point roll that takes less than
1.25 second to complete.  You can see 4 very short pauses.  The manever
appears to be centered.  I see no change in height or coming in or out.  It
appears to be between 150M and 175M.  But the pauses are so short that I
cannot really tell if the rolls between pauses are 90 degrees.  So I cannot
see what the 1 point per 15 degree down grade should be.

What would you do?

Randy

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

  _____  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 2/27/2007
3:24 PM

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

  _____  

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.5/707 - Release Date: 3/1/2007
2:43 PM

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070302/03ea7695/attachment.html 