[NSRCA-discussion] Chapter-5 Going too far.
Del K. Rykert
drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Fri Jun 29 10:10:10 AKDT 2007
That is why I have such a issue with software being used to grade people
that sit the chair long after the fact or flight has been completed. If
they want to do it right.. Tape the flight with other competent judges to
see if that judge rewarded scores correctly. Unfortunately, it only proves
they were clear headed, awake and caught all the correct flaws that one
given flight. I have seen some very competent capable people miss a major
downgrade much to their chagrin after sheets are turned in.
It is not a perfect system. It is better in most cases than the random
grabbing of warm bodies that used to prevail years ago.
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Cronkhite" <seefo at san.rr.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Chapter-5 Going too far.
> At the TOC in 2000, on the very last flight of the event, Chip had a 1
> 1/4 positive snap to the right on a vertical downline, but he instead
> did 1 3/4 snaps to the left. Because he exited the correct direction,
> only ONE judge out of ten (Peter Wessels) caught it. The other 9 judges
> gave him VERY good scores.
>
> Don't always assume that the higher score is correct. It's entirely
> possible they just didn't see the downgrades/mistakes made.
>
> -Doug
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list