[NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question

[Ron Van Putte]

Every Nats contestant, except those in Intermediate should expect to  
judge one session.  Every judging session in excess of that earns  
$30.  We do not expect Intermediate pilots to judge unless they want  
to and have the requisite training/ experience.

Ron Van Putte

On Jul 27, 2007, at 10:36 PM, John Pavlick wrote:

> Uh, how much do Nat's judges get paid? I thought it was a volunteer  
> thing. If not, where's MY check from 2006? Oh yeah, I brought my  
> own scribe too...  <LOL>
>
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Del K. Rykert
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 7:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
>
> Those that make it to the finals should be required to pony up for  
> the added cost of judging and help defray the cost for the awards.  
> applies to all classes that make it to the finals in those classes  
> that hold finals.
>
>     Del
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Derek Koopowitz
> To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
>
> I would argue that the FAI pilots that are not in the top 20 also  
> don't get a fair shake - they only fly 4 rounds compared to  
> everyone else's 6.
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca- 
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del K. Rykert
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:48 AM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
>
> and to add further insult to injury...  why is it that the other  
> two classes have to pay the same price to compete at the nats but  
> not be entitled to the same treatment?  That sure helps encourage  
> the attitude that all members and pilots are treated as equals in  
> all classes.. !!!
>
>     Del
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Fred Huber
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
>
> It would be a substantial change to the way the NATS is run...
>
> Are you proposing reducing the number of rounds others (the ones  
> who don't make the finals) fly to make the time for the finals rounds?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert & Casey Green
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:29 PM
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
>
> Wanted to run this past you all to see what your thoughts were on  
> this.  We know that Advanced is suppose to prepare you for Masters,  
> what if the advanced at the NATS took a similar route to what the  
> masters does; meaning that the top 8 guys in masters get to fly in  
> a 4 round final.  What if advanced had a 3 round final, and the  
> best score was carried over from the previous 4 rounds.  I was  
> thinking that this would certainly make things a little more  
> interesting for the Adavnced folks.  Questions and comments are  
> welcomed.
>
>
>
> TIA
>
> Robert
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.20/919 - Release Date:  
> 7/26/2007 9:56 AM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070728/fe910c7d/attachment.html