[NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
Derek Koopowitz
derekkoopowitz at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 22:17:15 AKDT 2007
Nats judges only get paid if they work more than their standard assignment
(1/2 day).
_____
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Pavlick
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:36 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
Uh, how much do Nat's judges get paid? I thought it was a volunteer thing.
If not, where's MY check from 2006? Oh yeah, I brought my own scribe too...
<LOL>
John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Del <mailto:drykert2 at rochester.rr.com> K. Rykert
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
Those that make it to the finals should be required to pony up for the added
cost of judging and help defray the cost for the awards. applies to all
classes that make it to the finals in those classes that hold finals.
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Derek Koopowitz <mailto:derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
I would argue that the FAI pilots that are not in the top 20 also don't get
a fair shake - they only fly 4 rounds compared to everyone else's 6.
_____
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del K. Rykert
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:48 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
and to add further insult to injury... why is it that the other two classes
have to pay the same price to compete at the nats but not be entitled to the
same treatment? That sure helps encourage the attitude that all members and
pilots are treated as equals in all classes.. !!!
Del
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred <mailto:fhhuber at clearwire.net> Huber
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
It would be a substantial change to the way the NATS is run...
Are you proposing reducing the number of rounds others (the ones who don't
make the finals) fly to make the time for the finals rounds?
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert <mailto:robcase1 at cox.net> & Casey Green
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:29 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS advanced question
Wanted to run this past you all to see what your thoughts were on this. We
know that Advanced is suppose to prepare you for Masters, what if the
advanced at the NATS took a similar route to what the masters does; meaning
that the top 8 guys in masters get to fly in a 4 round final. What if
advanced had a 3 round final, and the best score was carried over from the
previous 4 rounds. I was thinking that this would certainly make things a
little more interesting for the Adavnced folks. Questions and comments are
welcomed.
TIA
Robert
_____
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_____
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.20/919 - Release Date: 7/26/2007
9:56 AM
_____
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_____
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_____
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070728/2a71b476/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list