[NSRCA-discussion] all this talk of sequences - Sportsmanquestion

[John Ferrell]

The intention of providing a box exit/re-entry is to allow a reposition for 
those who need it. IMAC seems indifferent to box discipline.

If your positioning is good during practice you could consider it an 
opportunity to add turn around maneuvers for the next class up. If you can 
handle it you can also do those turn arounds in contests providing you make 
them out of the box and remember to call entries and exits.

John Ferrell    W8CCW
"Life is easier if you learn to plow
       around the stumps"
http://DixieNC.US

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kelly Regan" <kelly.regan2 at verizon.net>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] all this talk of sequences - 
Sportsmanquestion


> EDIT
>
> My question is why where the breaks added into the sequence
> to begin with?
>
>
>
> Kelly Regan wrote:
>> I have a question about how the Sportsman sequence was devised.
>>
>> In IMAC the entry level sequence (basic) is flown with no breaks
>> unlike the entry level (sportsman) class in pattern.
>>
>> My question is why where the breaks added into the sequence ?
>>
>> When I try to fly (practice) the sportsman pattern sequence I find
>> the breaks actually create a distraction for me.  For some reason
>> I find myself practicing the IMAC basic more then the pattern
>> sportsman.
>>
>> Thanks for the help
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> ________________________________
> Kelly Regan
> Home Page: www.reganspace.com
> ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>