[NSRCA-discussion] Thick trailing edges

jivey61 at bellsouth.net jivey61 at bellsouth.net
Tue Jan 16 10:35:57 AKST 2007


Peter
 I isn't a fad. It actually works. On my Phaseone pattern plane, I split the
ailerons lengthwise and inserted thin triangle stock piece of balsa. This
made the ailerons about 3/8 inch thick.
The result was a very soft feel around neutral.When the ailerons were
deflected the turbulance off the aileron decreased and the sensitivity came
back.The full travel sensitivity stayed the same. The snaps became very
predictable,the point rolls were very easy to stop on points,because as the
plane went through this soft phase at neutral it actually slowed to the
stop.
I exaggerated the thickness so I could readily see a change,and I did.
I only did this on the ailerons,but it could be done on the elevator and
rudder. Matter of fact it is done in IMAC quite a bit on the rudder.

Jim Ivey
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Pennisi" <pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
To: "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:32 AM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Thick trailing edges


> How effective are thick trailing edges in softening up the feel of a
surface
> around neutral?  Is it a fad or does it actually work.
>
> I am putting together my second model with composite wings which have very
> thin trailing edges (Comp-ARF -IMPACT). I have never been really
comfortable
> with the feel on my first model. I am thinking of removing some of the
rear
> wing to increase the thickness of the trailing edge (Should not be too
> difficult - only concern will be if ailerons will be large enough to force
a
> decent snap)
>
> The model came at the right price so it was always destined as a test bed
to
> try out some ideas.
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list