[NSRCA-discussion] ...Snips....RE:SmallModels...goodforthefutureofthePatternEvent?

[Rex LESHER]

Good stuff Dave....   you've apparantly been paying attention all these years!!!  lol

Rex
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Lockhart<mailto:davel322 at comcast.net> 
  To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
  Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:44 PM
  Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] ...Snips....RE:SmallModels...goodforthefutureofthePatternEvent?


  ...long....

  Just my opinions on a variety of ideas in this string -

  It is an aerobatic event....a vertical upline that does not have a 1,2,3,4
  second or 100, 200, 300' vertical requirement is no more demanding than 2
  loops, an Immelman, or a 1/2 Reverse Cuban has plenty of power to do a brief
  vertical line.

  Fewer rules for Sportsmen and Intermediate means more options.  Plenty of
  existing planes suitable for flying pattern glow or electric are available
  from .25 sized to 2M - and there are expensive and "cheap" options at both
  ends of the size range.  For many of the existing sport airplanes, power
  upgrades are relatively simple and cheap - many 40s can be replaced with
  bolt in 46s, many 60s can be replaced with bolt in 90s.

  I don't think anyone with a shred of sanity could question the commitment of
  a guy like Mike Hester to growing the sport of pattern.  Absolutely the
  Black Magic is competitive at any level, but to be competitive at all levels
  it requires the high end powerplants and radio gear.  Cost of the airframe
  is only part of the expense - "cheap" competitive powerplants don't exist
  per se - the most competitive powerplant will always be the one with the
  best power to weight ratio (and that always cost money).

  Do you want a used "Ferrari" or a new "Ford"?  Ie, for the same $$$, a
  Sportsman or Intermediate pilot might be able to buy last years Masters/FAI
  full blown 2M ship, or a brandy new 110 sized bird.  The bigger ship, if
  well maintained, will fly better.

  It is a competitive event which means competitors will seek a competitive
  advantage.  On the average the latest and greatest will be pioneered by
  those at the top of the heap, and the latest and greatest stuff will command
  a premium price, and it will be emulated by the masses.  Supply and demand
  will always make the latest and greatest the most expensive.  No one is
  unaware of the expense of the "best" stuff and everyone knows how the event
  could be cheaper - but - we all buy the best we can afford to gain
  competitive advantage and "we" have repeatedly voted to allow 2M in all
  classes. 

  Restricting airframes or engines in the lower classes to reduce cost is a
  plausible idea.  However, you now placing a pilot in a position where they
  need to upgrade planes/engines each time they move up in class, if they want
  to fly the most competitive airframes.  You have further reduced the resale
  audience for used Masters/FAI planes.

  No doubt some of the historical rule changes have been impetus in part for
  some leaving the event - partly because any change would have done so, and
  partly because the changes resulted in increased cost.  Nonetheless, I think
  it is incredibly naïve to think a "new" set of rules would result in a
  return in numbers that pattern once had.  Rules are only part of it -
  renewal rates in any event/hobby are never 100% (change in interests) and
  participation for many is cyclic (time off during college, time off to start
  a career, time off for family, etc).  Growth of the event was from those
  newly enticed, and those that returned.  Today, more competing hobbies are
  out there which gobbles up some number of potential new guys and some number
  of former guys that now pursue something different.  It is what it is, and
  no number of rules changes will make "the difference".

  What I've seen of late on this list is a very diverse and wide range of
  opinions on what ought to be done.  When 10 guys list 10 different reasons
  why they no longer compete, it is beyond me what single rule is going to fix
  that.  Any one change we make to appease 10% of those in or close to our
  midst is going to do little to grow the event in numbers (beyond 10%, for
  arguments sake) and any change you make is likely to be viewed unfavorably
  by some (probably a different 10%).

  In the meantime, the constant negative banter (much of it supposition only
  with no demographics to support it) amidst ourselves certainly can't be
  enticing to any new guys taking a peek.

  Hey, can you believe the weather?  January and my home field saw 3-4 pattern
  pilots out both Sat and Sunday, and I "burned" 15 lipos worth of
  electrons!!!  Woohoo!!!!

  Dave


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion<http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070108/f73264b5/attachment.html