[NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models

[Ed Miller]

Yes, that is known as the BPA, Ballistic Pattern Association.  So soon there 
will be 3 pattern venues to split the already dwindling pattern base :).
Ed M.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Earl Haury" <ehaury at houston.rr.com>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models


Interesting indeed - a local club is considering holding a "ole fashion" 
pattern contest this fall. The plan is to fly pre-turnaround pattern. Not 
sure exactly what the rules will be - but not SPA, as the intent is to allow 
'70's - '80's airplanes with piped engines & retracts (one member mentioned 
a Brushfire with piped Jett 90).

I'm very comfortable with pattern as it is - however, there is a gap between 
current pattern and SPA that many seem interested in.

Earl
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Koenig, Tom
  To: NSRCA Mailing List
  Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 7:16 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models


  Guys-there are many of us that reminisce about the 'simpler' days of the 
60 size models, even down here!

  I mentioned recently to some locals that I may hold a comp similar to your 
SPA stuff. I considered just allowing 60 size models as a max, never mind 
all the vintage rules etc.....I was SWAMPED with interest. There were all 
sorts of ex pattern pilots ready to show up. I think I'd have had 40 -50 
possible entries!!!

  Not trying to stir things up-but it is interesting nonetheless.

  Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ron Lockhart
    Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2007 11:31 AM
    To: NSRCA Mailing List
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Smaller Models


    Yea, smaller has a number of advantages.
     A reduction in money, time, hassle factor, etc., of models is a thought 
toward increased participation.
    (Yea, I know the established pilots, and new pilots, are allowed to fly 
smaller models right now.  But we have a
    lot of history  that shows Dean's comment "Given that everyone will 
build or buy up to the maximum size limit" is true.
    How does that Dixie thing go?....<G>

    Ron Lockhart

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Dean Pappas
      To: NSRCA Mailing List
      Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:51 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace


      Hi John,
      A year or so ago, I puit together an Excelleron 90 for a review and 
eventual sale to a newbie.
      Boy! Was it nice to drop a plane into the minivan in one piece!
      It was almost as good as when a Phoenix 8 would fit into the back of a 
hatchback Camaro in one piece.

      Given that everyone will build or buy up to the maximum size limit,
      is there a good enough reason to push on the rules bodies to legislate 
Pattern plane sizes back down?
      How about 1.6 or 1.7 meters square?
      Will this affect cost and complexity enough to have a beneficial 
effect on participation?
      Or am I just whistling Dixie?

      later,
      Dean
      Dean Pappas
      Sr. Design Engineer
      Kodeos Communications
      111 Corporate Blvd.
      South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
      (908) 222-7817 phone
      (908) 222-2392 fax
      d.pappas at kodeos.com

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Ferrell
        Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 3:07 PM
        To: NSRCA Mailing List
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Header Brace


        There seems to be a growing trend toward smaller airplanes among a 
lot of folks. I sure am enjoying the 90 size Boxer I bought from Ed Miller 
last summer. Less hassle to transport, assemble and fly. That means I can 
fly more!

        John Ferrell    W8CCW
        "My Competition is not my enemy"
        http://DixieNC.US




--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
        ************************************************************************
        *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
        be confidential. If received in error, please delete all
        copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or
        dissemination of this email or its attachments is
        prohibited without the consent of the sender.

        WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
        outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty
        is given that this email or its attachments are virus free.
        Before opening or using attachments, please check for
        viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any
        affected attachments.

        Any views expressed in this message are those of the
        individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
        and with authority, states them to be the views of the
        organisation.
        ************************************************************************




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion