[NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

[twtaylor]

I was taught to stay on the point as long as it took you to get to the
point, is that wrong?

 

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:37 PM
To: randy10926 at comtekmail.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

 

Randy,

 

You as the Judge must not guess whether something happened or did not. The
pilot should produce a maneuver that is easy to judge. If he fails to show
you what is needed, and you are not sure that he did show you, then it's
your responsibility to downgrade.

 

MattK

 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: randy10926 at comtekmail.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:23 AM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Judging Question

Ok time to get back to our favorite list questions.

This comes from a real life judging problem.  The question is about the
4-point roll.  This what I am seeing.  A 4 point roll that takes less than
1.25 second to complete.  You can see 4 very short pauses.  The manever
appears to be centered.  I see no change in height or coming in or out.  It
appears to be between 150M and 175M.  But the pauses are so short that I
cannot really tell if the rolls between pauses are 90 degrees.  So I cannot
see what the 1 point per 15 degree down grade should be.


What would you do?


Randy

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <javascript:parent.ComposeTo(> 

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

size=2 width="100%" align=center> 

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at
<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=ht
tp://www.aol.com> AOL.com.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070228/d97d0d22/attachment-0001.html