[NSRCA-discussion] Great Deal on pattern plane at Tower

[mike mueller]

 I will also say that their website is easy to navigate and has more info on the products than other sites. Horizon's website should be as easy. I just have a problem with how long it takes for things to get from Champagne Illinois to my house in Hoffman Estates Ill. Horizon get's things there the next day if you order before 11am. Tower takes about 5 days. This is with the cheapest method. I've found it easier to call my LHS, Venture and have them order what I want from Great Planes/ Tower. They will have it the next day and I save the shipping except that I have to go pick it up. Mike

rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:    The positive side of Tower is their super simple RETURN policy. They even send you the RETURN labels with your ordered goods and they are even pre-paid....by them. You don't really need a reason to send the thingie back, so you don't even need to call them. Slap the label on it and get it to the local UPS. It's that simple!!
   
  MattK
  

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Eddie Batchelor <perkinsrx at centurytel.net>
To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 4:01 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Great Deal on pattern plane at Tower

          ·        I didn’t misread it. That was why put the LOL at the end of my sentence.  I was just testing to see how fast you guys would catch it.
  ·        I agree with Mike on Tower not doing a good job. Entirely to many discrepancies in their ads.  The Flight Power batteries with incorrect weights listed earlier this summer is a good example. In fact  it is still a good example. The most recent catalog I have shows a picture of the F3A 5350 packs but they only have small packs listed anymore.
   
      
---------------------------------
  
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Robert Harden
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:45 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Great Deal on pattern plane at Tower

   
    Ha Ha  Ok,  Eddie misread the ad, but it was funny.

      ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Ron Van Putte 

    To: NSRCA Mailing List 

    Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:37 AM

    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Great Deal on pattern plane at Tower

     

  Wow!  What a deal.  It's only missing the fuselage, wings and ailerons.  But it's new, with severe damage.  Gotta jump on that. 
     

    Ron Van Putte

     
      On Dec 27, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Eddie Batchelor wrote:

  


    This deal is just too good to not share. Take a look, A venus II for only $63.50. I found this in Tower’s Scratch & Dent Section !!  LOL
          <image001.jpg>
    LS0611
    Great Planes Venus II ARF .61-.91,66" (New/Severe Damage)
missing fuselage, wings & ailerons 
  Also available New and Unused
    219.99 
    63.50 
    <image002.gif>

  <image001.jpg><image002.gif> 
    _______________________________________________

    NSRCA-discussion mailing list

    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


   

    
---------------------------------
  
  _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


  
_______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  

    
---------------------------------
  More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20071228/3580f220/attachment-0001.html