[NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought

[Lance Van Nostrand]

John,
Even though your contests are small, they are extraordinary feats.  El Paso is new, Alb is new within the last few years.  Growth in the SW is apparent and excellent for the population density.  Keep going!!

--Lance

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Gayer 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 11:06 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought


  At Lubbock last weekend there were 2 Sportsman, 3 Intermediate, 2 advanced, 5 Masters and 4 FAI as i recall.. All threeof the contests in this area that I have attended have had about 17 contestants. El Paso had a total of 13 in Spotsman and Intermediate.which is a good sign for the future.
  John

  Claude Weimer wrote: 
    How many Masters Flyers are generally in the contests you fly in? We may have 4 or 5 Advanced and 10 to 15 Masters.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Gayer
    Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:53 PM
    To: NSRCA Mailing List
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought



    Western district 6. I live in Albuquerque and fly Advanced. Jeff Hill and I have competed against a total of one other contestant in three contests(Albuquerque, El Paso and Lubbock).
    John Gayer
    NSRCA 632

    Claude Weimer wrote: 

    What part of the country are you in?



    Claude




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Gayer
    Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:17 PM
    To: NSRCA Mailing List
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought



    This sounds good to me as a compromise. From what I've seen, we are currently having difficulty getting enough competitiors for the classes we have now without adding another class.
    John

    vicenterc at comcast.net wrote: 

    Claude,



    Suggestion:  Why we don't call Expert = F3A and fly the P schedule only in local contests?  The only change we will need to make is that  Expert = F3A becomes the last AMA class.  In other worlds, Master should not be the terminal AMA class.  Adding another class will add cost to the contest and probably will be longer to run. 



    Regards,



    --
    Vicente "Vince" Bortone



      -------------- Original message -------------- 
      From: "Claude Weimer" <cweimer at tconl.com> 




      I have been thinking, it might be time to bring back the Expert class.  The reason I say this is because the Masters class is becoming rather large and is going to grow in the coming years. The problems I see are the difficulty judging at local contests.  At the St Louis contest it took an hour and a half to judge Masters.  Because Masters is the largest class compared the Advanced and Intermediate and only three FAI, it can be difficult to organize Judges for Masters.  I'm not singling out the St Louis contest, the Omaha contest was the same as most contests I have been to.  If Masters was split in two classes it would inc! rease t he available people to judge.



      Masters could be a little easier and Expert could be harder.  Expert could even be the last FAI P schedule.  The reason some don't wish to move to FAI is the time to learn two schedules.  It looks like the Masters class is going to get larger and I think it would be good to break it split it up.



      Claude Weimer




----------------------------------------------------------------------------



          Subject: 

          [NSRCA-discussion] Food for thought
         
          From: 

          "Claude Weimer" <cweimer at tconl.com>
         
          Date: 

          Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:33:59 +0000
         
          To: 

          "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
         



          To: 

          "'NSRCA Mailing List'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
         






_______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion   

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

   _______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 _______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070830/20ce652d/attachment.html