[NSRCA-discussion] [Fwd: Proposal]
John Gayer
jgghome at comcast.net
Wed Aug 22 16:47:51 AKDT 2007
Thanks, Ken. Maybe we could raise even more money by removing pilots
from the national database so they can fly under the radar. :-)
I also really liked what Mark had to say about the local marketing of
NSRCA. I remember those days. Having a member at each contest with some
stray K-Factors, some flyers about "what the NSRCA does for you" and the
gift of gab would go a long way towards gaining new members.
How about a trophy for "most improved flyer" . Of course we would need
the national database :-) to figure out who that might be.
John
Ken Thompson wrote:
> John,
>
> I've studied your proposals and I honestly don't see any real
> downsides, not that I expected to:-)
> The only major problem I have is, with the national database, other
> pilots would be able to see my many downfalls, before the contest.
>
> Nicely done,
>
> Ken
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* John Gayer <mailto:jgghome at comcast.net>
> *To:* NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2007 7:12 PM
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] [Fwd: Proposal]
>
>
> I'd like to present three proposals that might appeal to a few if
> not the many....
> Modified from the original proposal . Apparently not many saw it.
> The first one has been added
> Comments?
> John
> NSRCA 632
>
> *Revive the practice of assigning mentors to Sportsman and
> Intermediate flyers
>
> *At contests, assign an experienced competitor to mentor, call and
> advise the Sportsman/ Intermediate flyers. This is nothing new,
> but should be a part of every contest. We should try to provide a
> connection that will last past the contest.
> As I see it, there are four issues that drasticaly affect the
> ability of these flyers to compete effectively: aircraft trimming,
> execessive throws, wings level and centering(also known as flying
> the airplane, not letting the airplane fly you).
> These flyers have shown the initiative to come out and compete. We
> owe them (and ourselves) all the help we can throw at them.
>
>
> *Create a National Database for Pattern
> *
> The database must contain the raw scores of all flights for all
> competitors by class. The only thing normalized scores are good
> for is finding the right finish order for each class at a
> contest. Raw scores are much better for comparing results even at
> a contest. For example I finish round one with a 930 and round two
> with a 985, both to competitor A. Now did I fly a lot better in
> round two(I thought I did) or did competitor A flop a stall turn
> in the figure M in round 2.
> Anyway once you have the raw scores by competitor and class, you
> can do the following:
>
> 1. Create a National Ranking for each class based on average
> points per maneuver. Once this is in place and on line, we
> will have a reason for pattern competitors to join NSRCA.
> you can't tell me that there wouldn't be a lot of interest
> in seeing who is hot around the country and how you stack up
> against the competition. I know, the judging isn't always
> equal but that's always been true and we have to live with it.
> 2. The data available on each competitor would include contests
> entered, placing, advance points earned. The districts could
> extract whatever data is required to ascertain the district
> champions. We could archive previous years as well.
> 3. Other ways to specify advancement in class become available,
> percentage of average FAI score, even eventually moving the
> 10 top-rated pilots up a class. Possibilities are endless
> when you have the data.
>
> Since the database would only be open to NSRCA members, if you
> want to track your National standing, joining NSRCA would be a
> must. If you want to see what the guy nobody heard of that just
> rolled in from out of district has accomplished, look him up.
> We've been looking for reasons to join NSRCA, I feel this is one
> that could be big and would be worth some investment in time and
> money. I would be willing to help with such a project although I
> don't feel like I could take it on by myself.
>
> *Redirect the focus to our international team competition through
> modification of the advancement system
>
> *
>
> 1. Modify the advancement process to be consistent through all
> classes from Sportsman through to F3A. See section two for
> possible advancement criteria
> 2. Advancement can be forced by the advancement criteria(see
> section 2) or voluntary.
> 3. The first year in a new and higher class is an option year.
> At the end of the option year you can downselect one class
> for any reason.
>
> This has the advantage of being able to try out the higher class
> for a year without committing your entire pattern career. If you
> discover that the next class is beyond your means( time, money or
> talent) then you option down the following year. If you absolutely
> refuse to fly your new class, then perhaps you could use the time
> and money to reintroduce your self to your wife, girlfriend, etc.
> If you need a goal for the year, focus on making your rudder
> commands instinctive, learn to fly a helicopter, learn to fly
> rolling circles. You would probably come back a better pattern
> flyer than when you left.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070823/76337801/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list