[NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
Fred Huber
fhhuber at clearwire.net
Wed Aug 15 19:09:04 AKDT 2007
If there is no support for the forcing move up from Master to FAI
There can be no valid argument to force anyone to ever move up from any class.
Either the rules should have a consistant progression system... or no system to make the guy who likes taking st place at advanced home every contest for 30 years.
Tell Chip Hyde to fly Masters... Tell Todd Blose to fly Intermediate, Have Jason fly Advanced... and make the contest a joke.
Drive all the lower level competitors out of the sport.
It'll be great for Pattern.
We'll get hundreds of new members wanting to be able to say:
"I flew in Pattern and got a 100... to MattK's 1000..... he flew Sportsman this time because he didn't want to look like a fool compared to someone else."
Be consistant... or be shown the way the inconsistancy can be followed through on.
----- Original Message -----
From: rcmaster199 at aol.com
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
Masters needs it???
Move up to where?? Alaska??
Ohhhh....drop out when you reach your allotted points, that's what you mean. OKAY then... I see the logic
MattK
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Huber <fhhuber at clearwire.net>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
OK... its an AMA class
ALL OTHER AMA CLASSES HAVE THE FORCED MOVE UP POINT SYSTEM.
Masters needs it.
And... there's no real support for allowing someone to willy-nilly move between FAI and other classes whenever they want...
(no one does... because no one wants to practise FAI and any other class at the same time.. the lower class would take too much time from the FAI practice)
Rules need to be consistent... Or someone will notice that they aren't.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Taylor
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
FAI is class 406, an AMA Class, Just checked the rule book.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/rulebooks/RC%20Aerobatics.pdf
Fred Huber <fhhuber at clearwire.net> wrote:
In that case... there's no support for offering FAI class at an AMA sanctioned event.
Its not an AMA class. Have a seperate contest.
That worm turns 2 ways.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Thompson
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
The bottom line is this...the AMA has 4 classes, the top level being Masters. FAI is an international F3A class, not a AMA class..."in my opinion" there can never be a mandatory progression from an AMA SIG class to an international class.
As for your question, my logic should, and does, apply to every class controlled by the AMA...which is what I'm talking about.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: John Gayer
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
Why does this apply to every class except Masters??
Aren't there better flyers available to learn from in FAI? :)
John
Ken Thompson wrote:
Now THAT'S what I'm talkin' about!!! You will only get better if you do one of two things, 1. Fly against people that are better than you, obviously paying attention to their flights. 2. Have a pilot that is better than you willing to coach you. I've been blessed with having both...any contest I go to in D6 will have pilots that are better than I am, and I have Archie as a coach to help me through the little things. BTW: I fully expect to be flying Masters in 6 or 7 years. That will put me at 54 or 55 years old when I make the move. Personally I have no desire to go to contests and come in 1st or 2nd on a regular basis, AND stay in that class...it simply won't make me a better pilot. My goal is to
get better every year, with hard work and patience, it will happen. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: <rcpattern at stx.rr.com> To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection? I take exception to this. FAI and Masters are not related. I have been flying masters several years, finishing as high as second this year at the NATS. Yes, I'm coming back next year in Masters. I have a goal of winning the nats before I move up. I can be realistic...at some point with enough practice I might be able to crack the finals in FAI at the NATS, but I'm smart enough to know that realistically winning FAI isnt going to happen. I
would also argue that the guys that have been flying masters for years, just raise the bar. I know in different areas I've flown around the country, these are the guys that make guys fly better. Show up in District 6 sometime, and fly Masters...you'll definitely get better. 6 of the top 10 at the NATS were D6. The means, guy that finished in the top 10 at the NATS in what is probably top to bottom the most competitive class have trouble getting wood at a local contest. I can promise you though, the guys that fly here have greatly improved their flying than they would have in other parts of the country. Glen has set the bar here for a while, and I know the other guys are pushing to catch him, and if you look now at local contest scores, it is getting closer. At any given time down here in D6, I'd say 6 or 7 guys can take a round in masters. Now that makes it fun. I know when I was flying in D4 last year. Every contest I went to, was Verne K, and
Steve Miller....I knew I'd better put up great flights every flight and this makes you a better pilot. I think you should try moving up...take a year of the low 900's, and then see where you are the following year. I bet you start moving up and before you know it you would be right there in the mix. This is a competitive activity and the only way you improve is flying against people who are better than you. Arch ----- Original Message ----- From: John Gayer <jgghome at comcast.net> Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 3:41 pm Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection? To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Ron, I take exception to those rules. There should be only one destination class. Why shouldn't
there be a mandatory move from Masters to F3A? They are just two patterns with a natural progression as there is between Advanced and Masters. Parking and sandbagging is a mental state, not a rules violation. john Ron Van Putte wrote: The Master class is the top AMA class and there is no mandatory move from the Master class to F3A, so how can there be "parkers" or "sandbaggers"? Ron Van Putte On Aug 15, 2007, at 2:10 PM, John Gayer wrote: how about changing the AMA advancemant rule and keep it very simple?>> Your first contest of the year will determine your class for the year. You may go up one class at any time during
the year but may not go back down during the year. At the start of the next year you may drop back one class at your option, stay where you are or go up a class. This is simple enough that your fellow competitiors will know if you are following the rules. It will also be up to your fellow competitiors to insure that you are not sandbagging. I also feel strongly that sandbagging in Masters should not be allowed. If you disregard Sportsman, then
half of the classes allow parking. Obviously, F3A has to be a parking lot but I see no reason to allow this behavior in Masters. As a competant advanced pilot of somewhat advanced years, I have very little interest in moving to Masters in order to spend the rest of my pattern years trying to break 900 against the
parkers. I fail to see the logic in having two destination classes. Shouldn't we all aspire to progress to FAI? The current Masters schedule is designed as a stepping stone to Masters. Let's use it that way. John Gayer NSRCA 632 BUDDYonRC at aol.com wrote: There was a proposal on the last rules cycle that would allow a person to move up and test his ability then move back if he
had not attained the skills required for the higher class. I personally think it is a good idea and I also see no need for the point system like someone said if someone abuses the privilege we can solicit Earl and four other guys his size to take him behind the barn
and splain to him why he will be moving up. I believe peer pressure is all the control we need. I think this is worth a try. For those who have the ability and desire to achieve a spot at the top I don't see that we have a problem. Buddy --------------------------------------------------------------- --------- Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/? ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982>.>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- -------- _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion -----------------!
------------------------------------------------- ------ _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 5:19 PM
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 5:19 PM
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 5:19 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070816/afb0f4a7/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list