[NSRCA-discussion] StirringuptheMasters2009Sequencediscussionagain...

Tue Aug 14 15:16:17 AKDT 2007

you skipped the first line of my post
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Adrien L Terrenoire 
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] StirringuptheMasters2009Sequencediscussionagain...

  Fred, reread the proposal. As I read it he was saying the Dist champion each YEAR moves up, not the winner of any one contest! Noone is going to win the Dist with just one contest.

  Terry T.

  On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:04:21 -0500 "Fred Huber" <fhhuber at clearwire.net> writes:
    My idea regarding the "Pointing out" needing modification is a much more minor change...

    At least make it take a minimum of 2 contests to force advancement.  Just one win in the only contest a guy has ever flown in... can now mean thats the only contest the guy ever bothers with.

    If you want to force people to move up rather than "sandbagging"... fine.  I would hardly call a guy winning ONCE and then staying at the same level sandbagging.

    What happens if you get a "new crop" of Pattern flyers... and the whole group flying Sportsman are at their first contest.. and there's a dozen in the class?  You want to force the top 3 in Sportsman at that contest up?  

    IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Earl Haury 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:55 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Stirring uptheMasters2009Sequencediscussionagain...

      Buddy

      What TW & I are suggesting is that a fix for the large step between Advanced and Masters seems appropriate and are offering one possible solution. Along with that, I agree with you and Glen that there may need to be some adjustment to the points system. 

      Consider that the point system for advancement addresses the primary issue of forcing advancement upon someone who has been successful so as to provide "room at the top" for other competitors. A failing with this is that it assumes folks won't move voluntarily - most do, and often ill advised due to boredom in a specific class. Unfortunately, the system assumes everyone will eventually need to move up. That's obviously not always the case and some are faced with moving up or quitting - not a good choice! The ability to drop off points 4 years back helps the GOB - but possibly not in areas with lots of contests with large numbers of competitors. Maybe a limit on the number of points acquired in any one contest would help?

      So - the conversation is twofold, progression of difficulty within the classes being one topic and progression of competitors within the classes the other.

      Earl

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: twtaylor 
        To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' 
        Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:43 PM
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Stirring up theMasters2009Sequencediscussionagain...

        Hi Buddy

        I understand your point and I agree. Given the rules, as they are now, progression is a given. We can lobby to replace the advancement rules easily enough. My point was to make FAI a destination class as imho it should be. Not taking anything away from the Master Pilots but the guy that can fly and win Masters can fly and win in FAI. Seems to me we have two nearly identical classes and for what reason? What goal are we trying to achieve doing this? The goal of the entire sport is to advance a flier from beginner to at least national/regional contender, no?  I understand the GOB deal. What we did way back when was to really make FAI the top class, renamed Expert to Masters and called it an evening. Do I think Arch or Glenn could make the finals in FAI at our Nats? You dang skippy I do. Can I win an FAI contests locally? Probably not this year but maybe next. IMHO The reason we see such a large turn out in Masters and not FAI is because many don't want to fly against QQ and Chip and The Animal. Here's one to ponder.

        Jason goes to the worlds and wins the whole thing and makes us proud as we can be. Guess what? 

        IIRC the current rules allow Jason to fly masters, oh wait, If memory serves me Jason didn't point out of Advance he jumped straight from Advance to FAI. He could win the worlds then come home and fly his next contest in Advance. Wouldn't that cause a stir! I know he won't but he could. Back when I was flying Expert Turn Around and won pretty much every contest I entered, Kirk Grey decided to bring me down a peg or two,(Well actually 10 or so) at a contest in NC he dropped back from FAI to Expert. Taught me a great lesson he did. (Said in my best Yoda voice.)  J

------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of BUDDYonRC at aol.com
        Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:20 PM
        To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Stirring up the Masters2009Sequencediscussionagain...

        TW

        You have missed the point. If you make FAI a destination class and apply the progression rule it will definitely be a force which will in my opinion reduce our ranks.

        I don't think you understood my analysis of the location of the problem which is entirely my opinion.

        I think like Glen Watson that progression should be based on ability to perform not on a series of events which in some cases have nothing to do with ability or performance. 

        When we force advancement on a person who is not ready to move up due to what ever the case may be we are doing him an injustice and cutting off our nose to spite our face.

        Be real we have the Pro's and those with similar ability who aspire to join that group and possibly be a world champion and push products for the Hobby Industry 

         Then we have the majority, the Good Old Boys which is most of us who buy the stuff that the Pro group is pushing.

        The Good Old Boys just want to compete with each other progress according to our ability, drink a few cool ones and generally enjoy our sport. 

        The Top GOB is the one who wins Masters at the Nat's

        A GOB can jump the fence if he wants to and be a WC want to be and if he doesn't like the territory we will let him be a GOB again 

         But with today's rules GOB's move up when the rules tell them to and that's where some of our problems lie.

        I don't know how to express my opinion any simpler than that.

        Buddy 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
      Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.17/951 - Release Date: 8/13/2007 10:15 AM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 5:19 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070814/b53d6eae/attachment-0001.html 