[NSRCA-discussion] Point System - Was " Stirring up the Masters 2009Sequence discussionagain..."
Mark Atwood
atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
Tue Aug 14 04:59:45 AKDT 2007
Why do we have one? (point system)
Not to play devils advocate but do we really have that many people trying to
³cheat² to take home an extra plaque? Yeah, some people hang around a class
a little longer than others, but I don¹t ever recall someone staying beyond
the point where peer pressure failed, and we had to rely on an un-enforced
point system to get the job done.
I mean lets face it...if there¹s a guy just tearing up the advanced
circuit...winning everything in his path, A) he¹s going to get pretty bored
with that at some point B) he¹s going to get heckled to DEATH at some point
from the Master¹s guys calling him chicken since he¹s clearly afraid to
compete against kids his own size :) and C) and this is a big ³C²... Who
cares?? If I¹m flying Advanced against him and continually having my A$$
handed to me...then apparently there¹s room for my flying to improve. I can
choose to improve it staying in Advanced until either the aforementioned
sandbagger moves up and I can claim victory with my inferior flying against
now inferior competition, OR I can choose to bypass all together and move to
Masters and get a new challenge having never won the pinnacle of the
previous class, but feeling confident in my own abilities.
MORE importantly...if I fly for fun? Which I really think about 50% of the
flyers in pattern do, then I can hang at whatever level challenges me,
provides me with the best ³reward² level for my time and investment, and
maximize my ³fun².
I think the ³point² system should be little more than a guideline for the
avid competitor who¹s goal is to move through the classes, gain proficiency,
and who¹s target is winning in FAI. It¹s a guideline to know when it¹s
maybe time to move up, to prevent moving too early, and yet stay on a good
course for becoming the best.
For the rest, I think it¹s a non issue.
I¹m an avid golfer...I suck, but I¹m avid. My handicap says I should be
playing from the blue tees on most courses... But on a given day, I¹d much
rather go out and shoot an 82 from the whites, than post an 86 from the
Blues. Just my preference...it¹s more fun.
My .02
-Mark
On 8/13/07 2:23 PM, "BUDDYonRC at aol.com" <BUDDYonRC at aol.com> wrote:
> Glen
> I agree and also think the advanced schedule was softened to much to be a
> stepping stone to masters. The present Advanced pattern was designed
> accommodate the move from Intermediate to Advanced.
>
> The current Advanced schedule will keep the interest up through Advanced but
> may result in loosing pilots unless they are allowed to stay in Advanced,
> which as it is now
> Designed is a poor stepping stone to Masters.
>
> A smoother transition upward almost seems like it would require another class
> between Advanced and Masters
> It seems like we have two types of contestants, all having a true interest and
> dedication to the sport but one group lacks the basic tools to progress up the
> ladder as it is now designed.
>
> My observations indicate that this is one of the reasons we are loosing
> members.
> People who are competitive will compete as long as there is an attainable goal
> when that goal becomes to big a step or they or forced to move to a class that
> is above their ability or one that requires more time or equipment than what
> is available they move on to something that will more nearly suit their
> circumstances and still satisfy their desire to participate and be
> competitive.
>
> We have seen this many times in our own group when people move to FAI and then
> move back to masters because of one of the above examples.
>
> Where do those who are located in a lower class go?
> My observation as I mentioned before is somewhere else.
> Perhaps it is time to think about this and design some options that will
> maintain the interest of those who fall into that group and keep them from
> moving on.
> Buddy
>
>
>
>
> Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com
> <http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982> .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070814/87bb02cf/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list