[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

Fred Huber fhhuber at clearwire.net
Mon Apr 30 19:43:52 AKDT 2007


in essence they already tried... Its called an FAI stamp.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matthew Frederick 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:06 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1


  OK, this will probably sound crazy at first, but I think this idea has merit. In order to help defray the costs of the NATS why not have a $5 "competition fee" tacked on to the AMA dues for anyone who plans participating in an AMA sanctioned competition? Not for all sanctioned events, just competitions. The AMA could then put a "competition eligible" tag on the AMA cards of those allowed to compete. I compare this to a "lab fee" that universities charge students for taking lab-based classes to defray the equipment costs. In comparison to the money I spend in a year on pattern equipment $5 would be nothing. This way the entire competition community is helping to fund the NATS even though they won't all go, and the "sport" pilots won't be able to complain about anything that is done at the NATS. I'm willing to wager 5,000 people would pay the $5 fee to compete at local contests in order to keep the NATS open to all who want to compete. I know I would, and I've never even made it to the Nats because I've never really had a good opportunity to go. Just thinking out loud. I'll probably think differently in 10 minutes.

  Matt
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Joe Lachowski 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:50 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1


    To add to this. We need hard numbers. How many entrants does it take on a given day or event for the AMA to break even on cost. Just maybe some events don't pay their fair share as compared to others. 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      From: jlachow at hotmail.com
      To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:40:58 -0400
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

      Well if the Nats are in the red then there is a need to increase the number of attendees and/or increase the entry fee not the number of days. Wasn't this years entry fee increased?<g> Maybe all the SIGS need to encourage more of their people to attend or lose it. There was a time when pattern had over 150 plus attendees. There are some events that only have a handful of people involved. Maybe some of those small events need to be discontinued as part of the Nats.
       
      Tony, how much is in the red anyway? hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands of dollars?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
        From: tony at radiosouthrc.com
        To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:09:32 -0500
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1


        Ok.. .you asked for a need… here it is..



        The Executive Council is always pressed by sport fliers as to why funds should be spent on less than 1% of the membership to allow for a site for a Nats, as well as the staff support and equipment support required to run these events.  The Nats takes up 6 weeks of prime flying time for Muncie.  Other groups would like to use that time for events as well.  The Nats operates in the red every year.  



        So, if we reduced the number of days required to have a Nats, that would reduce costs as well.  How do we reduce the number of days required to run the pattern Nats?  Do we just increase the entry fee to take care of all of the costs so the sport fliers can then be told that the competition pilots “pay their own way”?  Do we (the EC) just ignore them and hope they go away?



        I am a BIG fan of competition and the Nats.  However, I can tell all of you that many on the EC don’t give a rat’s behind about competition or the Nats.  I am trying to represent competition and how important it has been in the past and will be in the future.  



        So, how does NSRCA handle it if we get cut to a 2-day even for the Pattern Nats?







        Tony Stillman, President

        Radio South

        3702 N. Pace Blvd

        Pensacola, FL 32505

        1-800-962-7802

        www.radiosouthrc.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hester
        Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:37 PM
        To: NSRCA Mailing List
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1



        ok, then one more:



        if it ain't broke, why fix it? Is there some underlying problem that we aren't aware of? I'm just not seeing the need I guess. if it were a vote, I'd definitely vote NOT to have to qualify for the Nats. 



        -Mike



          ----- Original Message ----- 

          From: Tony Stillman 

          To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' 

          Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:07 PM

          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1



          John:
          I realize that this is a different approach and that there are lots of opinions.  That is all I am asking for…





          Tony Stillman, President

          Radio South

          3702 N. Pace Blvd

          Pensacola, FL 32505

          1-800-962-7802

          www.radiosouthrc.com




----------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Ferrell
          Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:32 AM
          To: NSRCA Mailing List
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1



          Flame suit on, cannons loaded and ready...



          If you really want a good answer, ask the guys who are competing at Muncie this year.



          If you want to justify a position already decided, survey the population that will give you the answer you want!



          No offense intended.



          Why would you want to curtail the most successful segment of the Nats? Without the Nats, there is little point in maintaining Muncie. 



          (BTW, considering the source, I think you are shopping for ammunition rather than an argument!)



          John Ferrell    W8CCW
          "Life is easier if you learn to plow 
                 around the stumps"
          http://DixieNC.US

            ----- Original Message ----- 

            From: Tony Stillman 

            To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' 

            Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:40 AM

            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1



            Buddy:
            As I said at the beginning of this discussion thread, I am involved with a total NATS review.  We are talking about all of the NATS, nothing is too sacred to be up for discussion.



            One question I always had is why it the NATS an open event?  Most all sports NATIONAL championships require you to qualify.  With so many people complaining that the AMA NATS is 6-weeks long, this was brought up as a way to shorten the event.  It also would elevate the status of the NATS.  I don’t see how this would reduce participation at the local level.  It may actually increase it!



            Keep in mind that this is just DISCUSSION!!!  Don’t get all bent out of shape because we are talking about it.





            Tony Stillman, President

            Radio South

            3702 N. Pace Blvd

            Pensacola, FL 32505

            1-800-962-7802

            www.radiosouthrc.com




--------------------------------------------------------------------

            From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of BUDDYonRC at aol.com
            Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:56 PM
            To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1



            I have a question

            Why all of a sudden are you talking about special requirements needed for 

            Nat's entry.

            My take on this, is if this is done we will reduce participation. I may be wrong but if I am not how is this going to help pattern and the NSRCA?

            I think it will be the first step toward a further reduction in membership and a step toward an all professional Nat's 



            Second question

            Tony are you pushing this idea for real?  

            Buddy 




--------------------------------------------------------------------

            See what's free at AOL.com. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------

            _______________________________________________
            NSRCA-discussion mailing list
            NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
            http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


----------------------------------------------------------------------

          _______________________________________________
          NSRCA-discussion mailing list
          NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
          http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Discover the new Windows Vista Learn more! 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger  Get it now! 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007 9:14 AM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070501/f4e0f33a/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list