[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

[DwayneNancy]

I think this has be batted around for over 40 years.  Consensus seems always
to let anyone enter.  Dwayne

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 9:17 AM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

Tony,

Are you looking at having guys accumulate PARTICIPATION points, or
PERFORMANCE points?

To go to the Nats, would you have to attend a certain number of
contests or would you have to beat a certain number of other guys to
qualify?

Perhaps some sort of National Ranking system?

On 4/30/07, Tony Stillman <tony at radiosouthrc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Buddy:
> As I said at the beginning of this discussion thread, I am involved with a
> total NATS review.  We are talking about all of the NATS, nothing is too
> sacred to be up for discussion.
>
>
>
> One question I always had is why it the NATS an open event?  Most all
sports
> NATIONAL championships require you to qualify.  With so many people
> complaining that the AMA NATS is 6-weeks long, this was brought up as a
way
> to shorten the event.  It also would elevate the status of the NATS.  I
> don't see how this would reduce participation at the local level.  It may
> actually increase it!
>
>
>
> Keep in mind that this is just DISCUSSION!!!  Don't get all bent out of
> shape because we are talking about it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tony Stillman, President
>
> Radio South
>
> 3702 N. Pace Blvd
>
> Pensacola, FL 32505
>
> 1-800-962-7802
>
> www.radiosouthrc.com
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf
> Of BUDDYonRC at aol.com
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 6:56 PM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1
>
>
>
>
> I have a question
>
>
> Why all of a sudden are you talking about special requirements needed for
>
>
> Nat's entry.
>
>
> My take on this, is if this is done we will reduce participation. I may be
> wrong but if I am not how is this going to help pattern and the NSRCA?
>
>
> I think it will be the first step toward a further reduction in membership
> and a step toward an all professional Nat's
>
>
>
>
>
> Second question
>
>
> Tony are you pushing this idea for real?
>
>
> Buddy
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> See what's free at AOL.com.
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>


-- 

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/781 - Release Date: 4/30/2007
9:14 AM