[NSRCA-discussion] Futaba output voltage

[John Pavlick]

Anthony,
 The voltage level that he's talking about is only on the signal line (white
wire). The power that the servos use to drive their motors is taken directly
from the battery (or regulator output) like any other receiver.

John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com



 > -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
> Anthony Romano
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:39 AM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Futaba output voltage
>
>
> Hi Fred,
> Am I to imply from your comments below that Futaba receivers
> output a lower
> than optimal voltage to the servos? If so could I get a benefit from just
> changing receivers?
>
> Anthony
>
>
> >From: "Fred Huber" <fhhuber at clearwire.com>
> >Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> >
> >Note that using a dual-inverter "glitch buster"
> >http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/gadgets/noiserx.htm (especially
> with Futabe
> >127 DF RX's) will boost the signal line from the RX output (appx
> 3.8 v for
> >the Futaba 127 when using 4.8 v NiCd pack) to full RX pack
> voltage.  This
> >can increase effective resolution. (especially with long servo leads)
> >The circuit is INTENDED to filter interference from long leads... and it
> >works.  The side effect is almost as good as the intended purpose.
> >
> >  If you can find the chip to make the circuit... I'm having trouble
> >finding the DIP (.10 inch pin spacing) I got some .05 in pin spacing
> >chips... which are going to be harder than heck to solder into
> the circuit,
> >but should do the job.
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Scott Pavlock
> >   To: NSRCA Mailing List
> >   Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:59 PM
> >   Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] berg 7 channel Rx
> >
> >
> >   {trimmed}
> >   The nice part about this is it gives the ability of any
> analog servo to
> >output twice its normal torque.
> >   {trimmed}
> >
> >   Scott Pavlock
> >
> >
> >   On 9/13/06, White, Chris <chris at ssd.fsi.com> wrote:
> >     Hi Mike Mueller,
> >
> >     Oops…I meant to imply "They seem to be okay in low cost
> electrics"J
> >I'm not ready to try a $50 receiver in a big-buck R/C application either…
> >
> >     Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> >
> >     From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> >[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
> mike mueller
> >     Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:44 PM
> >     To: NSRCA Mailing List
> >     Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] berg 7 channel Rx
> >
> >
> >
> >      I know that Castle took a long time to introduce them to
> the market.
> >The initial designs that they had right after taking over Berg
> were not up
> >to the standards they wanted. I'm really impressed with these and can't
> >wait to try one. I'll also test them in a small IC plane before having
> >confidence in a pattern plane. The people at Castle are top notch. It's
> >also good to see an electronic component actually made here in
> the US. Mike
> >
> >     "White, Chris" <chris at ssd.fsi.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Mike,
> >     I know some foamie guys are using these and treat them like
> they are a
> >     standard.....They should be okay.
> >     Chris
> >
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> >     [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf
> Of Michael
> >     Wickizer
> >     Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:24 PM
> >     To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >     Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] berg 7 channel Rx
> >
> >     Anybody have experience with these receivers? At only 8 grams, sure
> >     would
> >     be a weight savings in electric applications.
> >
> >     http://www.castlecreations.com/products/berg_7-channel.html
> >
> >     Mike
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> >
> >     Do you Yahoo!?
> >     Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> >
> >
> >   _______________________________________________
> >   NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >   NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >   http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> >
> >
> >   No virus found in this incoming message.
> >   Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >   Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/446 - Release Date:
> >9/12/2006
>
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 9/14/06
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/448 - Release Date: 9/14/06