[NSRCA-discussion] RX choices

[White, Chris]

Okay...so much for remembering to past your address....sorry, oops.

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of White,
Chris
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:39 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] RX choices

Hi Adam,

I'm going off-list with this because I think I'm confirming the obvious:
I know diddely about electronics, but if I understand you correctly you
would trust this receiver in an (eg: YS160 equipped Pinnacle with
digitals) with as much confidence as any JR or Futaba receiver?

Thank you,
Chris White
(Tulsa)

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Adam
Glatt
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 1:30 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] RX choices

Wayne, I agree with you.  Prior to the new Berg models coming out, I 
would not even consider running an FM receiver in anything over 2lb.  
PCM is great because the control is perfect until there is too much 
noise, then the RX does what you told it to: hold or failsafe 
positions.  It also is pretty good about listing to my transmitter 
instead of the guy on a different brand or FM on the same channel.

I'm back to advocating FM because the Berg models have done it 
properly.  These models have a lot of signal processing, allowing them 
all the features that we love in PCM receivers:  perfect control until 
it goes into hold or failsafe, which we program; transmitter signal 
recognition.  So, PCM features in a receiver that costs $50, weighs 8g, 
has a weird antenna that you can cut to any length with only 
proportional range loss, has lifetime firmware updates through your 
computer, and has additional features through the computer programming 
system (that most of us won't use).  I say that this is a good receiver 
to choose.

It's not FM, it's Berg.

-Adam

Wayne wrote:
> I have a question guys.
>
> I see in lots of posts guys using FM (PPM) RX's.  Why is this?
>
> In today's market there are so many choices of good PCM RX's I can't 
> understand why someone would actually choose to run FM. Back in the
days 
> when I started RC there was no PCM and we had the choice of AM or FM.
I was 
> taught that my model was too important to me not to run the best link 
> possible, at the time FM was it.
>
> When PCM came in the price was much higher and I can see a reason to
not use 
> it. Today however both Futaba and JR have PCM RX's that are good for
under 
> $99, JR now even has one that PLL Synth. So why use FM?
>
> It is my understanding with today's PCM that noise rejection is so
much 
> better with PCM that it seems along with its F/S properties both model
and 
> people are better protected. I can see the reasoning among average
modeler 
> its price why else do MPI, FMA and so on make such a profit on off
brand 
> leads and servos that are in my opinion very sub par. I felt that in
the 
> pattern community with available models shrinking, and the cost of
models 
> hitting larger prices that guys would trust their baby to better
equipment. 
> I mean a basic pattern model that is on the cheap is going to be $1000
to 
> $1500 all up. The difference in a 127 Futaba RX and say a Futaba 138DP
PCM 
> or JR 790 PCM version is about $40
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Wayne 
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>   
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion