[NSRCA-discussion] Aero design question

John Pavlick jpavlick at idseng.com
Tue Sep 5 16:22:26 AKDT 2006


Randy,
I'm only using 9 for this setup... :)

John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com
  

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Glenn Hatfield
  Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:06 AM
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Aero design question


  They must have made the 12z for just this purpose.  Why else would you need 12 channels?

  Randy

  --- Rcmaster199 at aol.com wrote:

  From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Aero design question
  Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:03:40 EDT


  Now John may be on to something here....3 servos driving each aileron on a pattern plane. HMMMMM!!!

  If helical is what you want, cut the aileron 3 ways, proportional areas in each segment of course and drive it with Johns 3 preprogrammed servos. And you can use the smallest, fastest servos around so your response will be outasight. That's the ticket laddie, Ahuh....

  VBG

  I think I'll open another bottle of Rafanelli '02, and continue toasting :)

  Matt


  In a message dated 9/4/2006 10:50:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, jpavlick at idseng.com writes:
    Now that sounds like the way to go! Except I think you actually need 3 servos to do it right. I'm setting up the mix on my 12z now...

    John Pavlick
    http://www.idseng.com/
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of george w. kennie
      Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 9:55 PM
      To: NSRCA Mailing List
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Aero design question


      For cryin' out loud, if your going to go to all that trouble, use two servos per panel at the opposing extremes of each flexible aileron driving in opposite directions. Now that's HELICAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  What the  heck have you guys been smokin' ??????????????  And I thought I was extreme. Are we in the "Twilight Zone" here?  BGw?
      G.




        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Lance Van Nostrand 
        To: NSRCA Mailing List 
        Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 9:05 PM
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Aero design question


        Helical pitch ailerons!  Nat, this is brilliant.  Instead of making stiff ailerons, make them to flex.  glue the tip to the wing tip and drive the root end.  Ailerons would work just like a 74x6 propeller.

        --Lance

          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Nat Penton 
          To: NSRCA Mailing List 
          Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 9:31 PM
          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Aero design question


          Hey Tom
          I'm not providing solutions - just putt'in more wood on the fire. In steady state roll the least drag position of the ailerons would be constant AOA root to tip. This would call for the percentage of chord to progress linearly so that it would be double at the tip vs the mid span position - no different than helical pitch. A ( severe ?) negative would occur, though, when the ailerons are initiated, potentially causing a tip stall.

          Martin Simmons provides a curve showing Cl vs % of chord for the aileron. Going over 20% doesen't get you much for the dollar - just much more servo wear and tear ( especially with the 160 <G> ).

          IMO it is not worth the extra work to stop the ailerons short of the tip.                            Nat
  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/438 - Release Date: 9/5/06
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060906/87437d52/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list