[NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question -- nowjudgeing the M
Del K. Rykert
drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Tue Oct 17 15:30:58 AKDT 2006
Just goes to show how many don't read all the rules..
Del
nsrca - 473
----- Original Message -----
From: Gray E Fowler
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question -- nowjudgeing the M
Understood subjectivity will always be part pattern...
Let's see a show of hands of those who would apply a downgrade to an M flown
technically correct according to the AMA judging criteria although the belly
was seen during 1 or both of the stall turns.
Glen
No downgrade......who says the belly of the plane presents less well? That is BEYOND subjectivty and into crack smokin'.
People, please stop inventing rules that are not there. That kind of garbage is exactly what judges with grudges use to damage people they do not like, which we all know happens...so please stop interpreting between the lines. It does not HAVE to be the way you think..only the way the rules say-gosh darn it (substituted expression to clear censors).
Have a nice day otherwise
Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radome and Composites Engineering
Raytheon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061017/c1930b49/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list