[NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question -- nowjudgeing the M

Del K. Rykert drykert2 at rochester.rr.com
Tue Oct 17 15:30:58 AKDT 2006


Just goes to show how many don't read all the rules..  
 
                 Del 
          nsrca - 473
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Gray E Fowler 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Masters 2007 Figure "M" question -- nowjudgeing the M



  Understood subjectivity will always be part pattern...

  Let's see a show of hands of those who would apply a downgrade to an M flown
  technically correct according to the AMA judging criteria although the belly
  was seen during 1 or both of the stall turns.

  Glen 


  No downgrade......who says the belly of the plane presents less well? That is BEYOND subjectivty and into crack smokin'. 

  People, please stop inventing rules that are not there.  That kind of garbage is exactly what judges with grudges use to damage people they do not like, which we all know happens...so please stop interpreting between the lines. It does not HAVE to be the way you think..only the way the rules say-gosh darn it (substituted expression to clear censors). 

  Have a nice day otherwise 



  Gray Fowler
  Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
  Radome and Composites Engineering
  Raytheon


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061017/c1930b49/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list